<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micro-Brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/micro-brain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/micro-brain/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:21:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Calblog</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/micro-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>Calblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/479/micro-brain/#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gates likes blogs&lt;/strong&gt;
I have seen a couple of blogs on the Times article criticizing bloggers but no mention yet of this: Blogs are good for business, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates has said. In a speech to an audience of chief executives, Mr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gates likes blogs</strong><br />
I have seen a couple of blogs on the Times article criticizing bloggers but no mention yet of this: Blogs are good for business, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates has said. In a speech to an audience of chief executives, Mr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justene</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/micro-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Justene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/479/micro-brain/#comment-566</guid>
		<description>The way I read it. Microsoft wasn&#039;t embarassed about the Macs.  They were upset that he disclosed which building on campus the MSCopy shop was in.  It also seemed that he knew they were anal about these things (I assume for corporate espionage but maybe terrirism).  He said he was careful when he took the picture not to show any buildings or other security info.  Yet he&#039;s careless enough to disclose it in words.  Sounds to me like they have an ironclad security policy and he violated it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read it. Microsoft wasn&#8217;t embarassed about the Macs.  They were upset that he disclosed which building on campus the MSCopy shop was in.  It also seemed that he knew they were anal about these things (I assume for corporate espionage but maybe terrirism).  He said he was careful when he took the picture not to show any buildings or other security info.  Yet he&#8217;s careless enough to disclose it in words.  Sounds to me like they have an ironclad security policy and he violated it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Director Mitch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/micro-brain/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Director Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2003/11/03/479/micro-brain/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>I blog from work and even have work postings, but I am CAREFUL not to divulge ANYTHING in my posts: the company I work for, the specific industry, products.  The fact that I spend company time and resources blogging is enough to get me fired and it&#039;s just common sense - you don&#039;t air your company&#039;s dirty laundry to the public.  

The bottom line is that I have to put more of the blame on the blogger for not realizing the fairly predictable outcome of what he did.  It&#039;s not like MS management style is open, caring and forgiving.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blog from work and even have work postings, but I am CAREFUL not to divulge ANYTHING in my posts: the company I work for, the specific industry, products.  The fact that I spend company time and resources blogging is enough to get me fired and it&#8217;s just common sense &#8211; you don&#8217;t air your company&#8217;s dirty laundry to the public.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that I have to put more of the blame on the blogger for not realizing the fairly predictable outcome of what he did.  It&#8217;s not like MS management style is open, caring and forgiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
