<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reason™ vs. Reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;He is cryptostupid.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So is his colleague Tim Cavanaugh, only &lt;a href=&quot;/archives/2004/08/12/1764/reason-vs-reason-re-re-redux/&quot;&gt;without the &quot;crypto&quot; part.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;He is cryptostupid.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So is his colleague Tim Cavanaugh, only <a href="/archives/2004/08/12/1764/reason-vs-reason-re-re-redux/">without the &#8220;crypto&#8221; part.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Kalb</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Kalb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>I think he&#039;s trying to say &quot;closeted&quot; while trying to sound cool.

That&#039;s if it&#039;s analogous to cryptofascist, at least.

He is cryptostupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he&#8217;s trying to say &#8220;closeted&#8221; while trying to sound cool.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s if it&#8217;s analogous to cryptofascist, at least.</p>
<p>He is cryptostupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>Learn to read, please. He said he&#039;d get e-mails from cryptoracists if he didn&#039;t use that term. He did not say that &quot;only&quot; cryptoracists would use the term.

And, in case the plain meaning of his post isn&#039;t obvious enough to you, try deciphering this statement he made in the comments thread:

&lt;i&gt;I&#039;m fine with the phrase &quot;illegal immigrant&quot;, and I&#039;m fine with &quot;undocumented worker.&quot; But I&#039;m entertained by people who become apoplectic with rage when anyone uses the latter term.&lt;/i&gt;

Doesn&#039;t leave much room for misinterpretation, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learn to read, please. He said he&#8217;d get e-mails from cryptoracists if he didn&#8217;t use that term. He did not say that &#8220;only&#8221; cryptoracists would use the term.</p>
<p>And, in case the plain meaning of his post isn&#8217;t obvious enough to you, try deciphering this statement he made in the comments thread:</p>
<p><i>I&#8217;m fine with the phrase &#8220;illegal immigrant&#8221;, and I&#8217;m fine with &#8220;undocumented worker.&#8221; But I&#8217;m entertained by people who become apoplectic with rage when anyone uses the latter term.</i></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t leave much room for misinterpretation, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>Nice comeback, Julian ... um, I mean, &quot;Joe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice comeback, Julian &#8230; um, I mean, &#8220;Joe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>Just happened across this... sorry detective, not me.  Why on earth is a Bolt Beranek IP address supposed to indicate that I&#039;m the poster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just happened across this&#8230; sorry detective, not me.  Why on earth is a Bolt Beranek IP address supposed to indicate that I&#8217;m the poster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>The Bolt Baranek part says practically nothing about who the poster is.  As I noted in the original post, however, the referral log says that the poster was referred here from &lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/mt/mt.cgi?__mode=menu&amp;blog_id=1&quot;&gt;&quot;http://reason.com/mt/mt.cgi?__mode=menu&amp;blog_id=1.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  That page is only viewable to people with posting privileges on Hit and Run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bolt Baranek part says practically nothing about who the poster is.  As I noted in the original post, however, the referral log says that the poster was referred here from <a href="http://reason.com/mt/mt.cgi?__mode=menu&#038;blog_id=1">&#8220;http://reason.com/mt/mt.cgi?__mode=menu&#038;blog_id=1.&#8221;</a>  That page is only viewable to people with posting privileges on Hit and Run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobb</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/reason-vs-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/01/14/962/reason-vs-reason/#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Union America&lt;/strong&gt;
I agree that one cannot be against a welfare state and for global capitalism without being for open borders. It&#039;s a simple contradiction. It makes me believe that there are few good reasons for keeping the border closed and more good reasons for having...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Union America</strong><br />
I agree that one cannot be against a welfare state and for global capitalism without being for open borders. It&#8217;s a simple contradiction. It makes me believe that there are few good reasons for keeping the border closed and more good reasons for having&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

