<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Sense. v. Denver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spoons</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Spoons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/1236/common-sense-v-denver/#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve practiced municipal law, but I believe this suit will go nowhere.  In Illinois, at least, a city can&#039;t sue the state.  Period.  Cities exist only by virtue of the powers that the state provides.  If the state wants to take powers away, the city has nothing to say about it.  Put another way, states are sovereign; cities are not.

At least that&#039;s the way I remember Illinois law.  I&#039;d expect Colorado to be the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve practiced municipal law, but I believe this suit will go nowhere.  In Illinois, at least, a city can&#8217;t sue the state.  Period.  Cities exist only by virtue of the powers that the state provides.  If the state wants to take powers away, the city has nothing to say about it.  Put another way, states are sovereign; cities are not.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s the way I remember Illinois law.  I&#8217;d expect Colorado to be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/1236/common-sense-v-denver/#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never practiced municipal law; I&#039;m one of those transactional/regulatory types who has &quot;never lost a case.&quot;  I&#039;m not even sure that home rule exists as a concept in California or Arizona, where I&#039;m admitted.  It does seem like a &quot;hail Mary&quot; of an argument, unless home rule is somehow encoded in the Colorado constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never practiced municipal law; I&#8217;m one of those transactional/regulatory types who has &#8220;never lost a case.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not even sure that home rule exists as a concept in California or Arizona, where I&#8217;m admitted.  It does seem like a &#8220;hail Mary&#8221; of an argument, unless home rule is somehow encoded in the Colorado constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-3434</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/1236/common-sense-v-denver/#comment-3434</guid>
		<description>I thought the law exempted cities with populations greater than 400,000 (i.e., Denver)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the law exempted cities with populations greater than 400,000 (i.e., Denver)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/1236/common-sense-v-denver/#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics2004a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/2E0F1990B50BF91387256DF8005CB456?open&amp;file=1279LOC_01.pdf&quot;&gt;This interim version&lt;/a&gt; would have exempted Denver (see Section 18-9-204.5&#040;c&#041; on p. 5).  Fortunately, however, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics2004a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/2E0F1990B50BF91387256DF8005CB456?open&amp;file=1279_enr.pdf&quot;&gt;the final version&lt;/a&gt; did not contain that exemption, and in its place contains a specific directive to save the dogs that were on death row with the bill was signed into law on Wednesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics2004a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/2E0F1990B50BF91387256DF8005CB456?open&#038;file=1279LOC_01.pdf">This interim version</a> would have exempted Denver (see Section 18-9-204.5&#40;c&#41; on p. 5).  Fortunately, however, <a href="http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics2004a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/2E0F1990B50BF91387256DF8005CB456?open&#038;file=1279_enr.pdf">the final version</a> did not contain that exemption, and in its place contains a specific directive to save the dogs that were on death row with the bill was signed into law on Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Uncle</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/common-sense-v-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Uncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/04/23/1236/common-sense-v-denver/#comment-3436</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Co. BSL Update&lt;/strong&gt;
Xrlq alerts us that Colorado&#039;s Governor signed a bill into law banning Breed Specific Legislation. Good news! Denver, content to continue murdering 400 innocent animals...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Co. BSL Update</strong><br />
Xrlq alerts us that Colorado&#8217;s Governor signed a bill into law banning Breed Specific Legislation. Good news! Denver, content to continue murdering 400 innocent animals&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
