<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SUV Advice Requested</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3953</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3953</guid>
		<description>For about $40k, you can get a Cayenne.

That would allow you to simultaneously be able to drive an SUV and brag about owning a Porsche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For about $40k, you can get a Cayenne.</p>
<p>That would allow you to simultaneously be able to drive an SUV and brag about owning a Porsche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3954</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3954</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;More important than looking cool, I want to be able to use the SUV as an SUV, at least on occasion.&lt;/i&gt;

Answering this depends on how you mean &quot;use it as an SUV.&quot; Any 4x4 with decent ground clearance will work for most relatively tame off-road uses, but if you plan on going farther than that you&#039;ll need either a dealer-option &quot;off-road&quot; package that includes a slight lift and larger tires (okay), or an aftermarket off-roading lift kit for more inches and even bigger tires (better). However, the rougher the off-roading you want to be ready for, the less suitable the thing will be for its normal mall-terrain use. And mud tires can make for some interesting vibration at certain freeway speeds.

Would a Ford Escape have enough interior capacity for your needs? Being the smallest of the Ford SUVs it should get better mileage, be easier to drive and park in mall-terrain mode, and slip more easily into those narrow backcountry trails when you need to go bury/dig up your guns. And of course GM has its own choices in that size range, if you like GM. Jeep has the Liberty, which has replaced the non-Grand version of the Cherokee. Almost any furrin automaker with an SUV line would also have its options. If it didn&#039;t have to be brand new I could sell you our non-Grand 
Jeep Cherokee for $2900 but you&#039;d have to pick it up here and drive it back to California.

Of course, I consider the Cherokee to be just a compact statiojn wagon that happens to have 4WD, so Orange County may not accept it as a lawful SUV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>More important than looking cool, I want to be able to use the SUV as an SUV, at least on occasion.</i></p>
<p>Answering this depends on how you mean &#8220;use it as an SUV.&#8221; Any 4&#215;4 with decent ground clearance will work for most relatively tame off-road uses, but if you plan on going farther than that you&#8217;ll need either a dealer-option &#8220;off-road&#8221; package that includes a slight lift and larger tires (okay), or an aftermarket off-roading lift kit for more inches and even bigger tires (better). However, the rougher the off-roading you want to be ready for, the less suitable the thing will be for its normal mall-terrain use. And mud tires can make for some interesting vibration at certain freeway speeds.</p>
<p>Would a Ford Escape have enough interior capacity for your needs? Being the smallest of the Ford SUVs it should get better mileage, be easier to drive and park in mall-terrain mode, and slip more easily into those narrow backcountry trails when you need to go bury/dig up your guns. And of course GM has its own choices in that size range, if you like GM. Jeep has the Liberty, which has replaced the non-Grand version of the Cherokee. Almost any furrin automaker with an SUV line would also have its options. If it didn&#8217;t have to be brand new I could sell you our non-Grand<br />
Jeep Cherokee for $2900 but you&#8217;d have to pick it up here and drive it back to California.</p>
<p>Of course, I consider the Cherokee to be just a compact statiojn wagon that happens to have 4WD, so Orange County may not accept it as a lawful SUV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boifromtroy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>boifromtroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>My parents really like their Acura MDX, but I am not sure if it has ever been used off-road.  It has all the features of the BMW, etc. but is larger, cheaper and has SULEV certification (which *may* qualify you for free metered parking in the City of LA if you get a permit)

For off-road capacilities, the only maker that has a solid reputation is Jeep...but part of me thinks that is just marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My parents really like their Acura MDX, but I am not sure if it has ever been used off-road.  It has all the features of the BMW, etc. but is larger, cheaper and has SULEV certification (which *may* qualify you for free metered parking in the City of LA if you get a permit)</p>
<p>For off-road capacilities, the only maker that has a solid reputation is Jeep&#8230;but part of me thinks that is just marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3957</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3957</guid>
		<description>Honda has some great mini-vannish SUVs.  The Honda Pilot is an Acura MDX with slightly less luxury.
But I wouldn&#039;t want to take any Honda off-road.
Isuzu is trying to win some points with &quot;value-priced&quot; SUVs...
I guess I would say your best bet would probably be the Ford Explorer or a Dodge Durango for versatility and/or general coolness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honda has some great mini-vannish SUVs.  The Honda Pilot is an Acura MDX with slightly less luxury.<br />
But I wouldn&#8217;t want to take any Honda off-road.<br />
Isuzu is trying to win some points with &#8220;value-priced&#8221; SUVs&#8230;<br />
I guess I would say your best bet would probably be the Ford Explorer or a Dodge Durango for versatility and/or general coolness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spoons</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>Spoons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of the Nissan Pathfinder, preferably in yellow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the Nissan Pathfinder, preferably in yellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>Hope you like the Tahoe.

Even though you still are, after all, driving a Chevy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you like the Tahoe.</p>
<p>Even though you still are, after all, driving a Chevy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, those damned Chevys are &lt;i&gt;nothing&lt;/i&gt; like 
the GiMmiCk Yukon or the Denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, those damned Chevys are <i>nothing</i> like<br />
the GiMmiCk Yukon or the Denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3964</guid>
		<description>Ford is still the great American car company.

That said, I drive a Japanese car, and am &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0110_maserati/&quot;&gt;looking to move up to an Italian car soon&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is still the great American car company.</p>
<p>That said, I drive a Japanese car, and am <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0110_maserati/">looking to move up to an Italian car soon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>I suppose so, if one defines &quot;greatness&quot; in terms of how often a vehicle breaks down.  Mrs. Xrlq&#039;s Tempo was good for a migraine a week.  I&#039;ve heard mixed reviews about their more recent models.  My neighbors have an Explorer, and they swear by it.  However, they also told me that if they could have gotten a Tahoe for the same price, they would have.  The sad part is that they actually paid more for the Explorer than I did for the Tahoe, even before the financing is taken into account.

The moral of the story is never make a major purchase when you need it.  Instead, anticipate what you are going to need in the next year or two, and get when the gettin&#039;s good.  Right now, the gettin&#039;s OK for Ford, but excellent for GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose so, if one defines &#8220;greatness&#8221; in terms of how often a vehicle breaks down.  Mrs. Xrlq&#8217;s Tempo was good for a migraine a week.  I&#8217;ve heard mixed reviews about their more recent models.  My neighbors have an Explorer, and they swear by it.  However, they also told me that if they could have gotten a Tahoe for the same price, they would have.  The sad part is that they actually paid more for the Explorer than I did for the Tahoe, even before the financing is taken into account.</p>
<p>The moral of the story is never make a major purchase when you need it.  Instead, anticipate what you are going to need in the next year or two, and get when the gettin&#8217;s good.  Right now, the gettin&#8217;s OK for Ford, but excellent for GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/suv-advice-requested/comment-page-1/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/05/01/1478/suv-advice-requested/#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>My next vehicle purchase, as indicated, will have nothing to do with &quot;need.&quot;

It&#039;s all about getting the car before I wind up married and prohibited from driving anything other than a minivan. Pre-existing use, and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My next vehicle purchase, as indicated, will have nothing to do with &#8220;need.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about getting the car before I wind up married and prohibited from driving anything other than a minivan. Pre-existing use, and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

