<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Canonize Reagan, But Not Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:21:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>I know I would find it hard to argue that Reagan&#039;s faith in the American people was deserved, if they elect Kerry this November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I would find it hard to argue that Reagan&#8217;s faith in the American people was deserved, if they elect Kerry this November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calblog</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>Calblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dollar Coins and Estate Taxes&lt;/strong&gt;
One must always be careful when one says &quot;Hey I thought of it first.&quot; (Mainly because often time no one thinks of it first it&#039;s often just a matter of the first saying it in print and there is Always...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dollar Coins and Estate Taxes</strong><br />
One must always be careful when one says &#8220;Hey I thought of it first.&#8221; (Mainly because often time no one thinks of it first it&#8217;s often just a matter of the first saying it in print and there is Always&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Cross</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Zachary Taylor deserves his!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Zachary Taylor deserves his!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>Another option, which no one wants to consider, is to rotate Presidents on various bills.  I mean, seriously.  Just because George Washington appears on one $1 bill, does he really have to appear on all of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option, which no one wants to consider, is to rotate Presidents on various bills.  I mean, seriously.  Just because George Washington appears on one $1 bill, does he really have to appear on all of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Cross</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>Bring back the $500 bill and bump McKinley...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back the $500 bill and bump McKinley&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/06/09/1596/lets-canonize-reagan-but-not-now/#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with you about waiting until after the next election, but if anything is going to happen, Bush is going to need to win.  In any event, Jackson had his faults, but I would not like to see Jackson decanonized.  In any event, the idea no one talks about, but that I think would probably win quick approval would be to place Reagan on the Dollar &lt;i&gt;Coin&lt;/i&gt;.  Now I know many conservatives wouldn&#039;t be too excited about that just because it would accelerate acceptance of the Dollar Coin (in effect it would cause Conservatives to jump on board the dollar coin.)  Also, it would be a way to place Reagan on what will probably be one of the most acescdent pieces of coinage.  Well potentially ascendent, but probably only if a ex-president gets placed on the coin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with you about waiting until after the next election, but if anything is going to happen, Bush is going to need to win.  In any event, Jackson had his faults, but I would not like to see Jackson decanonized.  In any event, the idea no one talks about, but that I think would probably win quick approval would be to place Reagan on the Dollar <i>Coin</i>.  Now I know many conservatives wouldn&#8217;t be too excited about that just because it would accelerate acceptance of the Dollar Coin (in effect it would cause Conservatives to jump on board the dollar coin.)  Also, it would be a way to place Reagan on what will probably be one of the most acescdent pieces of coinage.  Well potentially ascendent, but probably only if a ex-president gets placed on the coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
