When You’re in a Hole…
…dig faster. If Marky-Mark York had a brain, he’d have let yesterday’s entry go without comment. If he had half a brain, he’d have stopped after I poked fun at him for falsely assuming I was a woman. If he had one-eighth of a brain, he’d at least have quit falsely assuming I was a woman by that point, rather than leave it up to me to mock him a second time over the same stupid assumption,without even attempting to answer Aphrael’s question as to where the hell he got that idea in the first place. Even one-sixteenth of a brain would have been enough to to heed Clark’s sage advice not to argue with me at all. There’s only one thing he clearly would not have done: blame me for his own idiocy.
xrlq
Well that’s enough of this guy: xlrq. [sic] That’s the problem with these right-wingnuts who blog anonymously. No one can read just who they are, so in the sea of links about him I hit the first one that gave me a real name. A female wingnut from the pile on the right. Har har. So he spent the day dissing my school and grades from his cave. Crawl back in troglodyte the coast is clear.
Got that? The first blogger who uses a real name and also links to me is a woman, therefore, I must be one, too. O-kay. Here’s an earlier post, in which he elaborated as to which woman I was supposed to be:
Blogger Infamy
I stirred the pile over at the wingnut blogs and now have an entire link-riddled post devoted to my demise via ad hominem by a vile right-wing female going under the handle Xrlq. Justene Ademec [sic] as near as I can tell. Whatever. The bitch is too stupid to comment on using innuendo and circumstantial ad hominems via my resume, grades and so on, and the fact that I got banned for calling Patterico a jerk for comparing Sen. Tom Daschle to a ventriloquist’s dummy.
Is that something a LA County prosecutor from Fort Worth with an elite Cornell education should do? I think it’s gutteral [sic] and he should be fired for crude public commentary unfit for a public employee.
So they DO hate: “Not to worry, all your York-hating needs can be met here.” The X woman’s website has crashed from onslaught. Such a nice Cal State bashing bunch. Conservatives for Harvard when it suits their needs.
So, the first blogger with a real name and a blog of her own links to me was Justene Adamec. Therefore, it stands to reason that I must be … Justene Adamec! Oops, I mean “Ademec.” No wonder this guy got an A in Logic at the prestigious California State University at Northridge, where he’s about to graduate cum laude (apparently, that’s what CSUN hands out to the 16% of its students who manage to make it all the way through without transferring or flunking out).
After this, I promise to try to return damnum absque injuria to its prior status as a York-free zone. If Marky-Mark manages to post anything new that it is so dumb as to still be blogworthy after this, I recommend he go back to his failed acting/writing career and try to get a contract to write the script for the forthcoming blockbuster, Dumber and Dumbererererererer.
July 16th, 2004 at 4:17 am
I’ll put this in language at your level: Go Cheney yourself you ad hominem-wielding uncredentialed cretin. If you had any gonads you’d say who the hell you are, but no you guttless right-wing fertilizer peddler. Fat chance of that. That’s why blogging without institutional backing is useless sniping from the cheap seats. In this case that’s where it belongs.
July 16th, 2004 at 5:39 am
Marky, keep on digging, you’ll arrive in Australia soon. :lol:
July 16th, 2004 at 6:15 am
Reading that guy’s (York’s) comments on various blogs is beginning to feel embarrassing, because he’s so pathetic. (In a real to-be-pitied sort of way). What a failed, sad, bitter man.
July 16th, 2004 at 6:46 am
You don’t think he’s married, do you?
I mean, he’s not breeding – is he?
July 16th, 2004 at 9:10 am
Dude, if you’re Justene, Why aren’t I coblogging over here too? Hmmm, interesting. Although I note for the record I’m not coblogging at Calblog much lately either. Busy with Summer Work…oh well.
July 16th, 2004 at 10:13 am
Hmmmm…since we already have “Fisking”, what can we use “Yorking” for?
July 16th, 2004 at 11:12 am
“Yorking” sounds vaguely emetic, perhaps something along those lines would be a good use.
July 16th, 2004 at 2:23 pm
Fvck the whole damn bunch of you.
July 16th, 2004 at 3:09 pm
Trojan Huddle: Get the Party Started, Already! Edition
Since my blogging is usually light over the weekends, and, with mother in town, a birthday party, a pool party and a birthday/pool party to attend, these links will have to get you through until I answer your questions: Boston…
July 16th, 2004 at 3:39 pm
“Yorking” sounds vaguely emetic, perhaps something along those lines would be a good use.
I agree. “Yorking” is a vomiting on the comment section of a blog. It is off-topic and incoherent.
It can be recognized by its paranoid voice, sensing persecution where none exists. It often expresses its paranoia defensively by genetic and psychogenetic fallacy and argument from age. It differs from flamebait and MEGO in that it has both a sympathetic and repulsive effect.
To respond is either to “York” yourself, or to react instinctually as you might when a dog tries to eat its own vomit or another’s.
July 16th, 2004 at 3:57 pm
Wait, is this like that April Fool’s gag from earlier this year?
July 16th, 2004 at 4:36 pm
No, it’s not, but I don’t blame you for thinking it might be. In fact, just this morning I commented to Mrs. X that Marky-Mark is so unbelievably stooopid that if I were anyone other than me, I’d suspect me of having made him up. I can assure you, I have not done that. Although, in retrospect I almost wish I had invented a “Liberal Larry” type character to post idiotic comments agreeing with Marky-Mark.
Of course, it’s always possible someone else is pulling an elaborate joke on me. For all I know, there might not really be a Mark A. York. Maybe his persona is just an ongoing prank by a group of conservative college students out to discredit the left? :idea:
July 17th, 2004 at 6:02 am
No I think you and Tim are doing good job of discrediting the right as if they need any extra help.