<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elton John: Only Rich Entertainers Have a Right to Speak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:52:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hube's Cube</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/comment-page-1/#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>Hube's Cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/1704/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SUNDAY MUSINGS&lt;/strong&gt;
The Wilmington (Delaware) News Journal has three(!) anti-conservative editorials in the big Sunday edition today. I shouldn&#039;t be surprised, I know, but three out of four! (The fourth has nothing to do with politics.) First, perpetual microcephalic Nor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SUNDAY MUSINGS</strong><br />
The Wilmington (Delaware) News Journal has three(!) anti-conservative editorials in the big Sunday edition today. I shouldn&#8217;t be surprised, I know, but three out of four! (The fourth has nothing to do with politics.) First, perpetual microcephalic Nor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/comment-page-1/#comment-4837</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2004 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/1704/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/#comment-4837</guid>
		<description>Michele (asmallvictory.net) also eviscerated Elton John today.

I include below the comment I posted to Michele&#039;s comment section. You can insert your name in place of her&#039;s, Jeff, as it works just as well on your thread as it did on hers.

Pity the objects of your wrath. :whip:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Great Caesar&#039;s GLAVIN! What an &lt;b&gt;ID-I-OT&lt;/b&gt; Elton John is!!!

Thank you, Michele, for dutifully (and with your usual aplomb) pounding another looney hack like a pinata, &#039;til only pulpy fragments remain. :-D&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele (asmallvictory.net) also eviscerated Elton John today.</p>
<p>I include below the comment I posted to Michele&#8217;s comment section. You can insert your name in place of her&#8217;s, Jeff, as it works just as well on your thread as it did on hers.</p>
<p>Pity the objects of your wrath. :whip:</p>
<blockquote><p>Great Caesar&#8217;s GLAVIN! What an <b>ID-I-OT</b> Elton John is!!!</p>
<p>Thank you, Michele, for dutifully (and with your usual aplomb) pounding another looney hack like a pinata, &#8217;til only pulpy fragments remain. :-D</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin aka Blogbat</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/comment-page-1/#comment-4835</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin aka Blogbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/1704/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/#comment-4835</guid>
		<description>The funny part is the fact the reason the Libs think it&#039;s censorship if no one hears them is precisely because of their own tactics of censoring their opposition in order that no one should hear them. Exempli gratia: the latest sockumentry on FoxNews and Moore&#039;s stated desire to shut them up. I think you will agree that what these Lefties really want therefore is to have an exclusive right to all media so they can start barking orders to America on their terms. Sick puppies, n&#039;est ce pas? Oh well. Great blog! btw how do you like WordPress for your site? Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny part is the fact the reason the Libs think it&#8217;s censorship if no one hears them is precisely because of their own tactics of censoring their opposition in order that no one should hear them. Exempli gratia: the latest sockumentry on FoxNews and Moore&#8217;s stated desire to shut them up. I think you will agree that what these Lefties really want therefore is to have an exclusive right to all media so they can start barking orders to America on their terms. Sick puppies, n&#8217;est ce pas? Oh well. Great blog! btw how do you like WordPress for your site? Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Huber</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Huber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/07/17/1704/elton-john-only-rich-entertainers-have-a-right-to-speak/#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>Amen to this, Xrlq. What ever stopped the Chicks from saying what they wished?  What stopped Whoopie?  &lt;u&gt;Answer:&lt;/u&gt; &lt;i&gt;Absolutamente nada.&lt;/i&gt;  They have their freedom of expression 100%, just as the average American joe does -- for instance, the pure right of expression to buy or not to buy a product from one w/whom they agree/disagree.

Bottom line:  Freedom of expression does NOT equal freedom from criticism.  Nor does freedom of expression equal absolute right to an income.  My job doesn&#039;t allow &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt; to say or do as I please, so why should an entertainer&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to this, Xrlq. What ever stopped the Chicks from saying what they wished?  What stopped Whoopie?  <u>Answer:</u> <i>Absolutamente nada.</i>  They have their freedom of expression 100%, just as the average American joe does &#8212; for instance, the pure right of expression to buy or not to buy a product from one w/whom they agree/disagree.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  Freedom of expression does NOT equal freedom from criticism.  Nor does freedom of expression equal absolute right to an income.  My job doesn&#8217;t allow <i>me</i> to say or do as I please, so why should an entertainer&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
