<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dog Trainer Editors Can&#8217;t &#8220;Seem&#8221; to Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:31:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patterico's Pontifications</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico's Pontifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5404</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Xrlq Gets a Correction in the L.A. Times&lt;/strong&gt;
Todat the Los Angeles Dog Trainer run this correction: Schwarzenegger </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Xrlq Gets a Correction in the L.A. Times</strong><br />
Todat the Los Angeles Dog Trainer run this correction: Schwarzenegger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Shaffer</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Shaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2004 03:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>Hey, you overlooked Dan Schnur&#039;s misinterpretation of the Constitution re Arnold and the presidency in an op-ed in - Yep, the LA Times - on Aug. 26.  Schnur noted that Gov. S was ineligible for the White House because of the TWENTY-THIRD Amendment. Last time I looked the 23d dealt with an electoral vote for D.C.  When that was called to his attention, this Republican advisor to presidents and governors said it was a typo on his part, that he meant that it was the TWENTY-EIGHTH Amendment that blocked Arnie&#039;s run for the Presidency. Even when it was pointed out to him that there isn&#039;t a 28th Amendment, he still insisted that was the reason Arnie can&#039;t run.   And this guy will be teaching Political Science at Berkeley this fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you overlooked Dan Schnur&#8217;s misinterpretation of the Constitution re Arnold and the presidency in an op-ed in &#8211; Yep, the LA Times &#8211; on Aug. 26.  Schnur noted that Gov. S was ineligible for the White House because of the TWENTY-THIRD Amendment. Last time I looked the 23d dealt with an electoral vote for D.C.  When that was called to his attention, this Republican advisor to presidents and governors said it was a typo on his part, that he meant that it was the TWENTY-EIGHTH Amendment that blocked Arnie&#8217;s run for the Presidency. Even when it was pointed out to him that there isn&#8217;t a 28th Amendment, he still insisted that was the reason Arnie can&#8217;t run.   And this guy will be teaching Political Science at Berkeley this fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico's Pontifications</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5383</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico's Pontifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5383</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;L.A. Times Corrects Error in Editorial, Sort Of&lt;/strong&gt;
The L.A. Times ran a letter today under the headline: Check the Constitution: Your Sept. 1 editorial, &quot;Schwarzenegger&#039;s Close-Up,&quot; begins with the &quot;intriguing possibility&quot; raised by Tony Quinn, a GOP political consultant, that the &quot;U.S. Constitut...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>L.A. Times Corrects Error in Editorial, Sort Of</strong><br />
The L.A. Times ran a letter today under the headline: Check the Constitution: Your Sept. 1 editorial, &#8220;Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Close-Up,&#8221; begins with the &#8220;intriguing possibility&#8221; raised by Tony Quinn, a GOP political consultant, that the &#8220;U.S. Constitut&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hube's Cube</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>Hube's Cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ahnuld as Veep?&lt;/strong&gt;
Xrlq takes apart the L.A. Times and GOP political consultant Tony Quinn for their complete lack of knowledge of the Constitution of the United States (emphasis mine): Tony Quinn, a GOP political consultant in Sacramento, raised an intriguing possibilit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ahnuld as Veep?</strong><br />
Xrlq takes apart the L.A. Times and GOP political consultant Tony Quinn for their complete lack of knowledge of the Constitution of the United States (emphasis mine): Tony Quinn, a GOP political consultant in Sacramento, raised an intriguing possibilit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boifromtroy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>boifromtroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>&quot;No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; &quot;

That second comma is interesting, yet troubling, because it makes me think that someone must have either been a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen, at the time of the adoption of the constitution; therefore no one born after 1789 would be eligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; &#8221;</p>
<p>That second comma is interesting, yet troubling, because it makes me think that someone must have either been a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen, at the time of the adoption of the constitution; therefore no one born after 1789 would be eligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRESTOPUNDIT -- &#34;Kerry in Cambodia&#34; Wall-to-Wall Coverage</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5359</link>
		<dc:creator>PRESTOPUNDIT -- &#34;Kerry in Cambodia&#34; Wall-to-Wall Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5359</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HOW STUPID ARE THE DEMOCRATS&lt;/strong&gt;
 at the L.A. Times? This stupid....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HOW STUPID ARE THE DEMOCRATS</strong><br />
 at the L.A. Times? This stupid&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5356</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 04:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5356</guid>
		<description>You jest, but a few months back, CNN made an argument that was  &lt;a href=&quot;/archives/2004/06/04/1589/cnn-vs-constitution/&quot;&gt;only marginally less stupid&lt;/a&gt; than your hypo.  And they &lt;i&gt;weren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You jest, but a few months back, CNN made an argument that was  <a href="/archives/2004/06/04/1589/cnn-vs-constitution/">only marginally less stupid</a> than your hypo.  And they <i>weren&#8217;t</i> kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico's Pontifications</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5355</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico's Pontifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5355</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Los Angeles Dog Trainer &quot;Doesn&#039;t Seem to&quot; Have the Ability to Read Simple English&lt;/strong&gt;
Xrlq rips the editors at the L.A. Dog Trainer for offering an (incorrect) assertion on a simple constitutional issue -- without bothering to research it by, for example, reading the Constitution. The Dog Trainer editors published an editorial this morn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Los Angeles Dog Trainer &#8220;Doesn&#8217;t Seem to&#8221; Have the Ability to Read Simple English</strong><br />
Xrlq rips the editors at the L.A. Dog Trainer for offering an (incorrect) assertion on a simple constitutional issue &#8212; without bothering to research it by, for example, reading the Constitution. The Dog Trainer editors published an editorial this morn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nels Nelson</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nels Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>Xrlq, my point was less about the second-fiddle status than it was that the vice presidency is generally understood, Dick Cheney notwithstanding, as the launchpad to a later presidential run.

But I see now, as you wrote, that this was a thought experiment, something fun for high school civics class dorks to snort about, rather than anything practical. (&quot;Here&#039;s one: if Clinton changed his name, had gender-reassignment surgery, underwent a complete blood tranfusion, and reduced his existence to only two dimensions he could run for another term. Hee hee!&quot;)

Good thing there aren&#039;t any here-on-Planet-Earth issues facing California that the L.A. Times could have devoted that space to instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xrlq, my point was less about the second-fiddle status than it was that the vice presidency is generally understood, Dick Cheney notwithstanding, as the launchpad to a later presidential run.</p>
<p>But I see now, as you wrote, that this was a thought experiment, something fun for high school civics class dorks to snort about, rather than anything practical. (&#8220;Here&#8217;s one: if Clinton changed his name, had gender-reassignment surgery, underwent a complete blood tranfusion, and reduced his existence to only two dimensions he could run for another term. Hee hee!&#8221;)</p>
<p>Good thing there aren&#8217;t any here-on-Planet-Earth issues facing California that the L.A. Times could have devoted that space to instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/09/01/1809/dog-trainer-editors-cant-seem-to-read/#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone really thought Schwarzenegger would accept the job as Veep.  It was more of a thought experiment.  The editorial actually stated that it is difficult to imagine Schwarzenegger playing second fiddle to anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone really thought Schwarzenegger would accept the job as Veep.  It was more of a thought experiment.  The editorial actually stated that it is difficult to imagine Schwarzenegger playing second fiddle to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
