Well, duh. Every single comment you’ve posted has underscored your status as a moron, even by trolling standards. Of course it was real easy! If you want a challenge, try saying something remotely intelligent for a change.

Joel: I hope you understand that when I call LGM a moron, it’s because he/she/it is a moron, not because he/she/it disagrees with me. Most of his/her/its ramblings are too incoherent to fully agree or disagree with, anyway.

It is doubtful anyone is overly concerned how many decks of cards you choose to play simultaneously. But if you claim expert historical perspective you might consider correcting your first comment since it was not Xrlq that made the reference to Yasser Arafat being the grandfather of terrorism but another commenter.

This is the most frightening thing you have said. Business and law? No wonder you are so ignorant.
Listen, you little twit, election fraud is part of the new face of democracy, thanks to other little twits like you, whom I like to rip a new one on daily basis, as I have done with you, in under… one post. But I have bigger fish to fry, small fry. It’s been real…easy, and I’m a high school drop out. Those damn liburals and their damn big gubmint edumakashun system.

“I don’t remember blogging anything remotely laudatory about Saddam Hussein. Even hyperbole has to be based on something.”

LOL!

If I had to guess, I’d say Carter is an idiotarian with a soft spot in his heart for leftist dictators, not a true idiot. IOW, I have little doubt that he would have caught the obvious frauds in last month’s election if the candidate had been someone like Augusto Pinochet, Anastasio Somoza or Fulgencio Batista. Like Dan Rather and his precious memos, Carter really wanted Chavez’s re-election to be legit, and also really wanted Al Gore to be President.

I don’t remember blogging anything remotely laudatory about Saddam Hussein. Even hyperbole has to be based on something.

Well, you claim that Jimmy Carter is totally dishonest. That means you believe that he cheats on his taxes and on his wife, that he lied to his kids when he told them that he loved them, for instance. Or, you wouldn’t possibly be engaging in some hyperbole, would you?

If I had a clue as to when you are being literal and when you are taking license, then I’d know more what to make of your positions.

Now, here’s my own hyperbole: you seem to have a higher opinion of Saddam Hussein than Jimmy Carter.

Joel: I don’t claim that only people who agree with my positions are intelligent. Nor would I make any such claim. Throughout my life, especially in grad school and law school, I’ve been surrounded by intelligent people, most of whom do not agree with me on just about anything.

LGM, I don’t know why you think you know my age, or why you think you are so much smarter than me, but if your last few comments are any indication, then frankly I’m not impressed. Had you bothered to follow the links rather than carp, you would have learned that that there is a 99% certainty that Hugo Chavez stole the vote. But I’m sure you are sooooo much smarter than the good folk at the Wall Street Journal and the International Herald Tribune, let alone some non-name little professors at such obscure universities as Harvard or M.I.T.

“Greater understanding,” my ass. You may or may not be older than me, but you’re certainly no wiser, and far less biased. You’re the one who plays the race card for no reason whatsoever, not me.