Comments on: Fact-Checking FactCheck.ORG http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/fact-checking-factcheckorg/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: timothy http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/fact-checking-factcheckorg/comment-page-1/#comment-6152 timothy Fri, 08 Oct 2004 23:28:56 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/1934/fact-checking-factcheckorg/#comment-6152 I am not American,but in common law and laws regarding arrest and search, reasonable suspicion is enough for arrest or search. Exibits eg WMD will be required for prosecution in court, so if you want to be sure that in order to make arrest you want to be sure that you need 100% proof of evidence to make arrest, I am afraid You will prosecute few or no criminal because arrest and search proceed prosecution in a court of law. In short, For search to succed, suspet needs to comply or force must be used, Enforcer needs only reasonable suspicion. In this case not only reasonable suspicion exists but evidence(direct and circumstatial) of 12 years is in abundace. I am not American,but in common law and laws regarding arrest and search, reasonable suspicion is enough for arrest or search. Exibits eg WMD will be required for prosecution in court, so if you want to be sure that in order to make arrest you want to be sure that you need 100% proof of evidence to make arrest, I am afraid You will prosecute few or no criminal because arrest and search proceed prosecution in a court of law. In short, For search to succed, suspet needs to comply or force must be used, Enforcer needs only reasonable suspicion. In this case not only reasonable suspicion exists but evidence(direct and circumstatial) of 12 years is in abundace.

]]> By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/fact-checking-factcheckorg/comment-page-1/#comment-6120 Xrlq Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:20:16 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/1934/fact-checking-factcheckorg/#comment-6120 D'oh. D’oh.

]]> By: Spoons http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/fact-checking-factcheckorg/comment-page-1/#comment-6117 Spoons Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:42:07 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/1934/fact-checking-factcheckorg/#comment-6117 "The post so nice, he put it up twice." What are you, distracted or something? “The post so nice, he put it up twice.”

What are you, distracted or something?

]]> By: DeoDuce http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/fact-checking-factcheckorg/comment-page-1/#comment-6107 DeoDuce Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:07:32 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2004/10/07/1934/fact-checking-factcheckorg/#comment-6107 they don't know they don’t know

]]>