<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonviolent Thugs Coming to Your Neighborhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-8013</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/1999/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/#comment-8013</guid>
		<description>Probably not.  Most drug offenses don&#039;t qualify as strikes.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.threestrikes.org/tscrimes.html&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s a list&lt;/a&gt; of the crimes that do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not.  Most drug offenses don&#8217;t qualify as strikes.  <a href="http://www.threestrikes.org/tscrimes.html">Here&#8217;s a list</a> of the crimes that do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz pratts</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>liz pratts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/1999/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>if the person hasn&#039;t gotten in trouble in the past 12 years of his last crimes one minor one serious, should he be under the three strike offender? all are drug cases but none involving kids, street selling or weapons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the person hasn&#8217;t gotten in trouble in the past 12 years of his last crimes one minor one serious, should he be under the three strike offender? all are drug cases but none involving kids, street selling or weapons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/1999/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;
First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#039;s Council for this week&#039;s vote. Council li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong><br />
First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/1999/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>If Prop. 66 passes, perhaps its many objectionable features can be remedied piecemeal by future props that each undo one horrible feature of Prop. 66.

Take for instance the &quot;Charles Criminal&quot; example; a Prop that focused solely on undoing Prop. 66&#039;s lumping of multiple strikes into one would be wildly popular and would pass easily.

Too bad there&#039;s no way for a future Prop to resentence the goons that Prop. 66 would release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Prop. 66 passes, perhaps its many objectionable features can be remedied piecemeal by future props that each undo one horrible feature of Prop. 66.</p>
<p>Take for instance the &#8220;Charles Criminal&#8221; example; a Prop that focused solely on undoing Prop. 66&#8242;s lumping of multiple strikes into one would be wildly popular and would pass easily.</p>
<p>Too bad there&#8217;s no way for a future Prop to resentence the goons that Prop. 66 would release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/comment-page-1/#comment-6904</link>
		<dc:creator>clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/10/31/1999/nonviolent-thugs-coming-to-your-neighborhood/#comment-6904</guid>
		<description>Xrlq, you and Patterico are (anti-)Prop 66 heroes. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xrlq, you and Patterico are (anti-)Prop 66 heroes. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
