Four Eight More Years!
Matthew Hoy has a brilliant idea: let’s concede the barking moonbats’ argument that George W. Bush wasn’t properly elected in either 2000 or 2004. That way, we can re-re-select him in 2008. I mean, it’s only fair. FDR pulled this crap on us in 1940 and again in 1944. We had to get him back eventually.
November 6th, 2004 at 12:04 am
Hey, if that’s the game, I’m willing to agree with the moonbats that he was illegitimate in 2000, and in 2004 for that matter.
November 6th, 2004 at 1:07 pm
I don’t have a problem with that idea. I also think while we’re in there adding the gay marriage amendment we might as well fix that 22nd amendment thing too. Eight more years of George W., then, after that he can turn it over to Jeb for another eight or even twelve years. After that, George P. will have enough political experience but still be young enough that he could be president for sixteen or even twenty years.
November 7th, 2004 at 3:17 pm
Lonewacko - it’s sad that the best candidates the republicans can come up with all come from the same family. Dynastic politics ill befit a republic.
November 8th, 2004 at 8:40 pm
I think “aphrael” is a liberal. It’s sad that some people just don’t get that the WOT is a real war. Instead, they want us to take a “global test.” Well, listen up, liberals! The WOT will take decades to complete, and the only people who truly know how to persecute the WOT just happen to be named “Bush.”
(j/k)
November 9th, 2004 at 12:28 pm
Relax, LW, there are plenty more Bush-Clinton years to come.
November 10th, 2004 at 8:55 am
W for Pres 2008?
Ok, this is a bit of a pipe dream, but bear with me here. Using the Moonbats own argument, that W did not win the 2000 Election but was appointed, if that is the case, then the 22nd Amendment comes