<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Tax) Cut the Cheese</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9857</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9857</guid>
		<description>Kevin, I agree.  However, you don&#039;t get to choose which IRS to deal with.  You do get to choose which tax software you&#039;ll use, though, so to the extent that the EULA makes a difference, TurboTax&#039;s is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I agree.  However, you don&#8217;t get to choose which IRS to deal with.  You do get to choose which tax software you&#8217;ll use, though, so to the extent that the EULA makes a difference, TurboTax&#8217;s is much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9810</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 02:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9810</guid>
		<description>Sigivald: if they acknowledge that I haven&#039;t yet &quot;agreed&quot; to the EULA merely by virtue of existing / owning the product for 10 days / etc., how can they expect me to be bound to a 10 day return policy?  Especially when a 60 day satisfaction guarantee is displayed prominently on the box?  Besides, if you can&#039;t get your money back, I&#039;m not sure what good it does to not be deemed to have &quot;accepted&quot; the EULA.

Mike: I don&#039;t know about Quicken, but I soon will, seeing as it was one of the freebies I picked up today with TurboTax.  Will keep you posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigivald: if they acknowledge that I haven&#8217;t yet &#8220;agreed&#8221; to the EULA merely by virtue of existing / owning the product for 10 days / etc., how can they expect me to be bound to a 10 day return policy?  Especially when a 60 day satisfaction guarantee is displayed prominently on the box?  Besides, if you can&#8217;t get your money back, I&#8217;m not sure what good it does to not be deemed to have &#8220;accepted&#8221; the EULA.</p>
<p>Mike: I don&#8217;t know about Quicken, but I soon will, seeing as it was one of the freebies I picked up today with TurboTax.  Will keep you posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9809</guid>
		<description>The main point of the EULA (which used to be considered accepted if you opened the package - to read the ELUA)is that, as you point out, &quot;we own the software. We&#039;re only letting you use if &#039;cause we&#039;re so bleedin&#039; generous.  If it works at all, that&#039;ll be a miracle and news to us.  If it doesn&#039;t work, feel free to write your own software (but be sure you don&#039;t accidentally infringe on any of our 1006 patents).

Just out of curiosity, is Quicken&#039;s package any better? EULA-wise, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main point of the EULA (which used to be considered accepted if you opened the package &#8211; to read the ELUA)is that, as you point out, &#8220;we own the software. We&#8217;re only letting you use if &#8217;cause we&#8217;re so bleedin&#8217; generous.  If it works at all, that&#8217;ll be a miracle and news to us.  If it doesn&#8217;t work, feel free to write your own software (but be sure you don&#8217;t accidentally infringe on any of our 1006 patents).</p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, is Quicken&#8217;s package any better? EULA-wise, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigivald</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9808</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigivald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9808</guid>
		<description>Your very first EULA complaint isn&#039;t quite on, I think.

Looks to me like the 10 days thing is your time-window for getting your money back. It does &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; read, to me, as a claim that you are assumed to accept the license if you haven&#039;t clicked &quot;accept&quot; within ten days.

That would be kinda pointless, since you can&#039;t even install the thing without clicking &quot;accept&quot; anyway, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your very first EULA complaint isn&#8217;t quite on, I think.</p>
<p>Looks to me like the 10 days thing is your time-window for getting your money back. It does <i>not</i> read, to me, as a claim that you are assumed to accept the license if you haven&#8217;t clicked &#8220;accept&#8221; within ten days.</p>
<p>That would be kinda pointless, since you can&#8217;t even install the thing without clicking &#8220;accept&#8221; anyway, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9806</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9806</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight:  You&#039;re complaining about EULA&#039;s for income tax software?  Just imagine if there was an EULA for Form 1040.... I&#039;ll bet you it&#039;d be far worse.

IRS EULA 103.5a) And if you don&#039;t pay, we can send people with guns to take you away and hold you hostage until you or your family pays (and maybe hold you a while longer to prove a point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight:  You&#8217;re complaining about EULA&#8217;s for income tax software?  Just imagine if there was an EULA for Form 1040&#8230;. I&#8217;ll bet you it&#8217;d be far worse.</p>
<p>IRS EULA 103.5a) And if you don&#8217;t pay, we can send people with guns to take you away and hold you hostage until you or your family pays (and maybe hold you a while longer to prove a point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9798</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9798</guid>
		<description>Mark, I&#039;m not sure I understand your point.  This EULA does all the things you list, with the possible exception of #4, and disclaims all liability which arises &quot;for any reason.&quot;  How is it &quot;better&quot; than any of them, except maybe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benedelman.org/news/112904-1.html&quot;&gt;Gator&#039;s spyware &quot;agreement?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  Short of requiring &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt; to indemnify &lt;em&gt;them&lt;/em&gt; for damages resulting from errors caused by &lt;em&gt;them,&lt;/em&gt; I&#039;m not sure how much worse it could be.

As I explained in the original post, the issue of installing on more than one computer is different for tax software than it is for most other applications.  If I install a single copy of Microsoft Windows on two computers, I get double the utility.  If I install a single copy of Tax Cut or Turbo Tax on two computers, all I get is the convenience of being able to work on my taxes from whatever computer is handy at any given time.  If they&#039;re that worried about piracy, why not allow users to copy the software willy-nilly, and just limit the number of tax returns that can be filed per each license?

I don&#039;t know if TurboTax has reverted to its evil ways or not.  Presumably, if it had, they wouldn&#039;t still be displaying their apologetic letter from early 2003 on their web site.  Regardless, I&#039;m returning TaxCut and buying TurboTax today.  That issue was the main reason I switched from TurboTax to TaxCut in the first place, so even if both products are now equally bad, that&#039;s no reason to pick TaxCut over the old standby. Plus, the TurboTax deal running at Fry&#039;s right now is better, anyway: $5 more for the package, but you get a free copy of Norton along with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I&#8217;m not sure I understand your point.  This EULA does all the things you list, with the possible exception of #4, and disclaims all liability which arises &#8220;for any reason.&#8221;  How is it &#8220;better&#8221; than any of them, except maybe <a href="http://www.benedelman.org/news/112904-1.html">Gator&#8217;s spyware &#8220;agreement?&#8221;</a>  Short of requiring <em>me</em> to indemnify <em>them</em> for damages resulting from errors caused by <em>them,</em> I&#8217;m not sure how much worse it could be.</p>
<p>As I explained in the original post, the issue of installing on more than one computer is different for tax software than it is for most other applications.  If I install a single copy of Microsoft Windows on two computers, I get double the utility.  If I install a single copy of Tax Cut or Turbo Tax on two computers, all I get is the convenience of being able to work on my taxes from whatever computer is handy at any given time.  If they&#8217;re that worried about piracy, why not allow users to copy the software willy-nilly, and just limit the number of tax returns that can be filed per each license?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if TurboTax has reverted to its evil ways or not.  Presumably, if it had, they wouldn&#8217;t still be displaying their apologetic letter from early 2003 on their web site.  Regardless, I&#8217;m returning TaxCut and buying TurboTax today.  That issue was the main reason I switched from TurboTax to TaxCut in the first place, so even if both products are now equally bad, that&#8217;s no reason to pick TaxCut over the old standby. Plus, the TurboTax deal running at Fry&#8217;s right now is better, anyway: $5 more for the package, but you get a free copy of Norton along with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9795</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9795</guid>
		<description>Have you read any other software EULA&#039;s? This is actually one of the better ones - they take a certain amount of responsibility for the software actually working. Most software licenses:

1) Disclaim merchantibility, fitness, non-infringement, etc. The only thing they&#039;ll guarantee is that if the disk itself is bad, they&#039;ll replace it - provided you demand it before they get busted for stealing the program in the first place.

2) Allow you to install it on just one machine at a time.

3) You don&#039;t actually own the software, but are just renting it for an indefinite period. That is, you can&#039;t resell it, modify it, or try to figure out how it works.

4) They may also forbid you from testing the program&#039;s performance versus other competing programs and from publishing the results of such testing. &lt;b&gt;In other words, you might have signed away the right of even putting a critical review onto your blog when you clicked through the EULA.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read any other software EULA&#8217;s? This is actually one of the better ones &#8211; they take a certain amount of responsibility for the software actually working. Most software licenses:</p>
<p>1) Disclaim merchantibility, fitness, non-infringement, etc. The only thing they&#8217;ll guarantee is that if the disk itself is bad, they&#8217;ll replace it &#8211; provided you demand it before they get busted for stealing the program in the first place.</p>
<p>2) Allow you to install it on just one machine at a time.</p>
<p>3) You don&#8217;t actually own the software, but are just renting it for an indefinite period. That is, you can&#8217;t resell it, modify it, or try to figure out how it works.</p>
<p>4) They may also forbid you from testing the program&#8217;s performance versus other competing programs and from publishing the results of such testing. <b>In other words, you might have signed away the right of even putting a critical review onto your blog when you clicked through the EULA.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle :  A blogging first?</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/tax-cut-the-cheese/comment-page-1/#comment-9787</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle :  A blogging first?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese/#comment-9787</guid>
		<description>[...] uo; Previous Post  &#124; Main &#124;   &lt;a name=&quot;4306&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 	A blogging first? &#124;By SayUncle&#124;  	&lt;a href=&quot;http://xrlq.com/archives/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese&quot;&gt;Fisking a EULA&lt;/a&gt;?   &#124; Link &#124;  &#124; Category: Blog Matters,  Technology &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uo; Previous Post  | Main | </p>
<p> <a name="4306"></a><br />
 	A blogging first?<br />
 |By SayUncle|</p>
<p> 	<a href="http://xrlq.com/archives/2004/12/05/2060/tax-cut-the-cheese">Fisking a EULA</a>?<br />
 | Link |  | Category: Blog Matters,  Technology | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

