<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contracts of Adhesion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-13059</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-13059</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Xrlq. I don&#039;t hold any misconceptions, and if it came up, I don&#039;t know how I&#039;d proceed, WRT a lawsuit. For one thing, I can&#039;t afford it. I suppose that&#039;s part of the logic behind their setting the level of their fine at $500 -- it&#039;s not enough to sue over. Well, perhaps self-representing in small claims court. And that&#039;s really what gets me about setting up a PayPal account. Even though I know that huge numbers of people use it without issue, I worry about getting crosswise with them over something. And so I sit on the fence, wanting the utility. Tweaking their terms makes me fell better about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Xrlq. I don&#8217;t hold any misconceptions, and if it came up, I don&#8217;t know how I&#8217;d proceed, WRT a lawsuit. For one thing, I can&#8217;t afford it. I suppose that&#8217;s part of the logic behind their setting the level of their fine at $500 &#8212; it&#8217;s not enough to sue over. Well, perhaps self-representing in small claims court. And that&#8217;s really what gets me about setting up a PayPal account. Even though I know that huge numbers of people use it without issue, I worry about getting crosswise with them over something. And so I sit on the fence, wanting the utility. Tweaking their terms makes me fell better about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-13052</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-13052</guid>
		<description>Actually, I didn&#039;t on the original draft, which was what I actually submitted to PayPal.  That&#039;s because I frankly don&#039;t care if they change the terms a month or two down the road.  It was only after Jed asked about cribbing the comments that I thought it best to make that change, in case he or anyone else saw fit to copy me.

Another change I would have made if I were serious about this crap is to actually read all the other documents that are incorporated by reference, and probably build in exceptions to them, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I didn&#8217;t on the original draft, which was what I actually submitted to PayPal.  That&#8217;s because I frankly don&#8217;t care if they change the terms a month or two down the road.  It was only after Jed asked about cribbing the comments that I thought it best to make that change, in case he or anyone else saw fit to copy me.</p>
<p>Another change I would have made if I were serious about this crap is to actually read all the other documents that are incorporated by reference, and probably build in exceptions to them, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-13051</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-13051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Question is, since they say that they can modify it just by publishing the new terms, how long can you expect that it’ll stay in effect?&lt;/i&gt;

But Xrlq said they can&#039;t.  Didn&#039;t you see that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Question is, since they say that they can modify it just by publishing the new terms, how long can you expect that it’ll stay in effect?</i></p>
<p>But Xrlq said they can&#8217;t.  Didn&#8217;t you see that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-13045</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-13045</guid>
		<description>Sure, with the caveat that I did this as a lark, and anyone who mimics me should do it in that spirit as well.  I have no clue whether or not any of it would actually be enforceable, and it may well get your account canceled.  They haven&#039;t canceled mine yet, and I don&#039;t really care if they do since I only created the account to receive one payment that has since cleared.  And unless you live in Orange County, CA, you&#039;ll probably want to change the forum clause to somewhere else (you&#039;re in CO, right?).  In my case, even if the revised contract &lt;str&gt;is&lt;/str&gt; enforceable, I&#039;m screwed the next time they amend it.  I&#039;ve fixed that problem on this blog entry, though.  I also deleted France from the list, just because.

This is probably a good time to remind anyone else reading this - you know better yourself, but those other guys might not - that &lt;str&gt;This.  Is.  Not.  Legal.  Advice.&lt;/str&gt;  As indicated by the graphic I &quot;borrowed&quot; from Beldar, I&#039;m a lawyer, but I&#039;m not &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; lawyer, and I&#039;m not anywhere nearly as careful deciding what to blog or when as I would be when dispensing legal advice.  So take everything I say on this blog with a very large grain of salt.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, with the caveat that I did this as a lark, and anyone who mimics me should do it in that spirit as well.  I have no clue whether or not any of it would actually be enforceable, and it may well get your account canceled.  They haven&#8217;t canceled mine yet, and I don&#8217;t really care if they do since I only created the account to receive one payment that has since cleared.  And unless you live in Orange County, CA, you&#8217;ll probably want to change the forum clause to somewhere else (you&#8217;re in CO, right?).  In my case, even if the revised contract <str>is</str> enforceable, I&#8217;m screwed the next time they amend it.  I&#8217;ve fixed that problem on this blog entry, though.  I also deleted France from the list, just because.</p>
<p>This is probably a good time to remind anyone else reading this &#8211; you know better yourself, but those other guys might not &#8211; that <str>This.  Is.  Not.  Legal.  Advice.</str>  As indicated by the graphic I &#8220;borrowed&#8221; from Beldar, I&#8217;m a lawyer, but I&#8217;m not <em>your</em> lawyer, and I&#8217;m not anywhere nearly as careful deciding what to blog or when as I would be when dispensing legal advice.  So take everything I say on this blog with a very large grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-13044</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-13044</guid>
		<description>Hey, I like that. Question is, since they say that they can modify it just by publishing the new terms, how long can you expect that it&#039;ll stay in effect?

Since I&#039;m considering setting up a PayPal account (even though I&#039;d rather not), can I crib your mods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I like that. Question is, since they say that they can modify it just by publishing the new terms, how long can you expect that it&#8217;ll stay in effect?</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m considering setting up a PayPal account (even though I&#8217;d rather not), can I crib your mods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/contracts-of-adhesion/comment-page-1/#comment-12765</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/03/2086/contracts-of-adhesion/#comment-12765</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stick Me with That Adhesion Contract&lt;/strong&gt;
I disagree with Xrlq&#039;s thesis: adhesion contracts are awesome. Large businesses of course cannot negotiate every aspect of every contract with every customer every single time. Conformity in contracts means efficiency; efficiency means lower costs; l...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stick Me with That Adhesion Contract</strong><br />
I disagree with Xrlq&#8217;s thesis: adhesion contracts are awesome. Large businesses of course cannot negotiate every aspect of every contract with every customer every single time. Conformity in contracts means efficiency; efficiency means lower costs; l&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

