<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo to James Dobson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13104</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry if my use &#039;cartoon&#039; was ambiguous, as I wanted to include just stuff for kids.  There&#039;s besides the SNL stuff obviously adult-themed cartoons out there.

As to the update, they&#039;re criticising a video containing spongebob.  Of course, spongebob&#039;s creators are cool with this, and would naturally be the target of the attack on the use of spongebob.  What spongebob does is at issue here. 

Neither story said that the radical clerics thought spongebob was gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry if my use &#8216;cartoon&#8217; was ambiguous, as I wanted to include just stuff for kids.  There&#8217;s besides the SNL stuff obviously adult-themed cartoons out there.</p>
<p>As to the update, they&#8217;re criticising a video containing spongebob.  Of course, spongebob&#8217;s creators are cool with this, and would naturally be the target of the attack on the use of spongebob.  What spongebob does is at issue here. </p>
<p>Neither story said that the radical clerics thought spongebob was gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13103</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13103</guid>
		<description>Thanks Xrlq.

Actus, although this is off-topic would the cartoon The Ambiguously Gay Duo be unacceptable to criticize if it was distributed to minors just because &quot;it&#039;s a cartoon.&quot;  
That&#039;s not what is happening here, and it is only right that Focus on the Family should keep parents aware of educators attempting to subvert the moral guidance of parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Xrlq.</p>
<p>Actus, although this is off-topic would the cartoon The Ambiguously Gay Duo be unacceptable to criticize if it was distributed to minors just because &#8220;it&#8217;s a cartoon.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s not what is happening here, and it is only right that Focus on the Family should keep parents aware of educators attempting to subvert the moral guidance of parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13101</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13101</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily, see the update.  Apparently, Dobson never really attacked SpongeBob, only to the content of an educational video he and several other cartoon charaters appeared in.  That&#039;s fair game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily, see the update.  Apparently, Dobson never really attacked SpongeBob, only to the content of an educational video he and several other cartoon charaters appeared in.  That&#8217;s fair game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13100</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13100</guid>
		<description>&quot;make any reference towards being skeptical of sexual identity, and the liberal media will see to it you are drawn and quartered.&quot;

Justifiably so with cartoon characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;make any reference towards being skeptical of sexual identity, and the liberal media will see to it you are drawn and quartered.&#8221;</p>
<p>Justifiably so with cartoon characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13099</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13099</guid>
		<description>I think you, and at this point half the blogosphere is wrong about this.  Dobson really didn&#039;t do anything wrong, but make any reference towards being skeptical of sexual identity, and the liberal media will see to it you are drawn and quartered.  Dobson is a good guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you, and at this point half the blogosphere is wrong about this.  Dobson really didn&#8217;t do anything wrong, but make any reference towards being skeptical of sexual identity, and the liberal media will see to it you are drawn and quartered.  Dobson is a good guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13095</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13095</guid>
		<description>We need to get these radical clerics on tv as much as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to get these radical clerics on tv as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Mind's Eye</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/memo-to-james-dobson/comment-page-1/#comment-13094</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Mind's Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/21/2114/memo-to-james-dobson/#comment-13094</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dobson is guilty of the very sexualization of culture he criticizes&lt;/strong&gt;
There is something that is beyond being merely &quot;just sad&quot; about Dobson&#039;s new campaign to prove that SpongeBob is a &quot;pro-gay cartoon.&quot; I will admit that I have watched only a handful of episodes, but I never found them to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dobson is guilty of the very sexualization of culture he criticizes</strong><br />
There is something that is beyond being merely &#8220;just sad&#8221; about Dobson&#8217;s new campaign to prove that SpongeBob is a &#8220;pro-gay cartoon.&#8221; I will admit that I have watched only a handful of episodes, but I never found them to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

