<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shelley&#8217;s Last Stand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13138</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13138</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ANOTHER SMELLY DEMOCRAT VOTE SCANDAL&lt;/strong&gt;
Voter fraud fiascos in Wisconsin and East St. Louis are now on top bloggers&#039; radar screen. Now, it&#039;s time to turn the spotlight on the stink in Sacramento. California-based watchdogs have been hot on the dirty trail of embattled Democratic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANOTHER SMELLY DEMOCRAT VOTE SCANDAL</strong><br />
Voter fraud fiascos in Wisconsin and East St. Louis are now on top bloggers&#8217; radar screen. Now, it&#8217;s time to turn the spotlight on the stink in Sacramento. California-based watchdogs have been hot on the dirty trail of embattled Democratic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13137</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13137</guid>
		<description>No argument there.  &quot;Kept&quot; is a better verb than &quot;made,&quot; as it&#039;s what we should expect of the office no matter who runs it.  It&#039;s also what I fully expected Shelley to do when he first assumed office, but it sure didn&#039;t take long for him to prove that expectation unwarranted.

Maybe the best solution is to reinstall Jones or any other boring, uneventful ex-SOS, and then amend the California Constitution to remove term limits for the SOS.  If California wants to keep on re-electing boring ol&#039; Bill, why not.  Meanwhile, have governors and lieutenant governors run in pairs like Presidents and Vice Presidents do at the national level, and have every other statewide officer serve at the pleasure of the governor.  I mean, let&#039;s face it, no one ever informs themselves well enough to vote intelligently on those offices anyway, and if anything goes south, the Governor is the one voters will punish.  If the buck is going to stop there, authority better reach there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument there.  &#8220;Kept&#8221; is a better verb than &#8220;made,&#8221; as it&#8217;s what we should expect of the office no matter who runs it.  It&#8217;s also what I fully expected Shelley to do when he first assumed office, but it sure didn&#8217;t take long for him to prove that expectation unwarranted.</p>
<p>Maybe the best solution is to reinstall Jones or any other boring, uneventful ex-SOS, and then amend the California Constitution to remove term limits for the SOS.  If California wants to keep on re-electing boring ol&#8217; Bill, why not.  Meanwhile, have governors and lieutenant governors run in pairs like Presidents and Vice Presidents do at the national level, and have every other statewide officer serve at the pleasure of the governor.  I mean, let&#8217;s face it, no one ever informs themselves well enough to vote intelligently on those offices anyway, and if anything goes south, the Governor is the one voters will punish.  If the buck is going to stop there, authority better reach there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphrael</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13136</link>
		<dc:creator>aphrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13136</guid>
		<description>To be fair, Jones *kept it* boring and harmless. Both March Fong Eu and Tony Miller had run very quiet, very boring SoS offices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, Jones *kept it* boring and harmless. Both March Fong Eu and Tony Miller had run very quiet, very boring SoS offices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13135</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13135</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I know.  Back then, no one knew about the scandals he is currently embroiled in.  However, I don&#039;t think the recall well, either.  All along he acted as though he were on a jihad to restore crass partisanship to an office his Republican predecessor had made every bit as harmless and boring as it ought to be.

Think of it this way.  If California&#039;s electorate shifted and we became a swing state again, Democrats would still win some close elections under SOS Bill Jones.  It would never work that way in reverse under SOS Shelley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I know.  Back then, no one knew about the scandals he is currently embroiled in.  However, I don&#8217;t think the recall well, either.  All along he acted as though he were on a jihad to restore crass partisanship to an office his Republican predecessor had made every bit as harmless and boring as it ought to be.</p>
<p>Think of it this way.  If California&#8217;s electorate shifted and we became a swing state again, Democrats would still win some close elections under SOS Bill Jones.  It would never work that way in reverse under SOS Shelley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13134</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13134</guid>
		<description>Xlrq -

My charity, I should point out, was in defense of his handling the recall business.  He made some noise here and there, at first, about delaying it, but let it run its course.  I certainly have no fondness for him over this sordid business and will happily see him go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xlrq -</p>
<p>My charity, I should point out, was in defense of his handling the recall business.  He made some noise here and there, at first, about delaying it, but let it run its course.  I certainly have no fondness for him over this sordid business and will happily see him go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lonewacko Blog</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13133</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lonewacko Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13133</guid>
		<description>The version &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_j_092704.htm#circulating&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is still incorrect.

I&#039;d say this is grounds for an extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version <a href="http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_j_092704.htm#circulating">here</a> is still incorrect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say this is grounds for an extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13132</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13132</guid>
		<description>If he actually extended the deadline, that would be fine.  That&#039;s not what they did.  Merely announcing a later deadline accidentally-on-purpose is a great way to trick people into signing the petitions late or sending them in late.  Note that the &quot;extended&quot; date is no longer on the site, now that they&#039;ve been caught with their pants down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he actually extended the deadline, that would be fine.  That&#8217;s not what they did.  Merely announcing a later deadline accidentally-on-purpose is a great way to trick people into signing the petitions late or sending them in late.  Note that the &#8220;extended&#8221; date is no longer on the site, now that they&#8217;ve been caught with their pants down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>You were right Xrlq, Shelley is Shady.  I&#039;ll be happy to see him go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were right Xrlq, Shelley is Shady.  I&#8217;ll be happy to see him go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphrael</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/shelleys-last-stand/comment-page-1/#comment-13129</link>
		<dc:creator>aphrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/01/26/2124/shelleys-last-stand/#comment-13129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. I would think that extending the deadline, thereby allowing more time for circulation, would be something the circulators were in favor of. Why is allowing more time for circulation a problem?

Circulation deadlines, along with signature requirements, can be found under the initiative titles and before the summaries on this webpage: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm#circulating&quot;&gt;Initiative Update&lt;/a&gt;. It looks like they are correct about what he is listing the deadline as.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. I would think that extending the deadline, thereby allowing more time for circulation, would be something the circulators were in favor of. Why is allowing more time for circulation a problem?</p>
<p>Circulation deadlines, along with signature requirements, can be found under the initiative titles and before the summaries on this webpage: <a href="http://ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm#circulating">Initiative Update</a>. It looks like they are correct about what he is listing the deadline as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
