<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News for Criminals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>&quot;“De novo” is an adjective phrase, not a verb&quot;

Exactly. Its a standard of review. Not a procedure. Not a trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“De novo” is an adjective phrase, not a verb&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. Its a standard of review. Not a procedure. Not a trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14876</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14876</guid>
		<description>&quot;De novo&quot; is an adjective phrase, not a verb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;De novo&#8221; is an adjective phrase, not a verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14873</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14873</guid>
		<description>&quot;They clearly mandated de novo review. If that wasn’t meant to be a de novo trial, I’m not sure what the point was.&quot;

De Novo means to grant no deference.  

Of course, it could also be that they meant something else but wrote this.  Textualism to the rescue!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They clearly mandated de novo review. If that wasn’t meant to be a de novo trial, I’m not sure what the point was.&#8221;</p>
<p>De Novo means to grant no deference.  </p>
<p>Of course, it could also be that they meant something else but wrote this.  Textualism to the rescue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calblog</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14863</link>
		<dc:creator>Calblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14863</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A comment that just couldn&#039;t last.&lt;/strong&gt;

I started writing this as a comment to this post over at Xrlq but I later decided I figured I ought to post it, after all, I thought it explained the harm Christians (of which I am one) pose to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A comment that just couldn&#8217;t last.</strong></p>
<p>I started writing this as a comment to this post over at Xrlq but I later decided I figured I ought to post it, after all, I thought it explained the harm Christians (of which I am one) pose to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14862</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14862</guid>
		<description>They clearly mandated &lt;i&gt;de novo&lt;/i&gt; review.  If that wasn&#039;t meant to be a &lt;i&gt;de novo&lt;/i&gt; trial, I&#039;m not sure what the point was.  Then again, I&#039;m not a litigator so maybe there&#039;s some subtle point here that escapes me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They clearly mandated <i>de novo</i> review.  If that wasn&#8217;t meant to be a <i>de novo</i> trial, I&#8217;m not sure what the point was.  Then again, I&#8217;m not a litigator so maybe there&#8217;s some subtle point here that escapes me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14861</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14861</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Congress mandated a new trial.  Do you, really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Congress mandated a new trial.  Do you, really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14858</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14858</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Old Testament &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; say &quot;eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth&quot; in several places.  See, e.g., &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=5&amp;chapter=19&amp;verse=21&amp;version=31&amp;context=verse&quot;&gt;Deut. 19:21.&lt;/a&gt;  Then again, so does the Colorado statute they were supposed to be enforcing, so I&#039;m not sure what the harm is in having jurors read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Old Testament <i>does</i> say &#8220;eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth&#8221; in several places.  See, e.g., <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=5&#038;chapter=19&#038;verse=21&#038;version=31&#038;context=verse">Deut. 19:21.</a>  Then again, so does the Colorado statute they were supposed to be enforcing, so I&#8217;m not sure what the harm is in having jurors read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steverino</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14856</link>
		<dc:creator>Steverino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14856</guid>
		<description>from the MSN article:

&lt;i&gt;The court said Bible passages, including the verse that commands “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” could lead jurors to vote for death.&lt;/i&gt;

Except the Bible never actually &lt;i&gt;says&lt;/i&gt; &quot;An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.&quot;  The only mention of that phrase is where Jesus brings it up, saying that His way (love your enemies, and be kind to those that do your harm) is the right way.  &quot;An eye for an eye&quot; comes from Hammurabi&#039;s code.

Does anyone else get the feeling that the quality of judges in this country has taken a markedly severe drop of late?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the MSN article:</p>
<p><i>The court said Bible passages, including the verse that commands “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” could lead jurors to vote for death.</i></p>
<p>Except the Bible never actually <i>says</i> &#8220;An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.&#8221;  The only mention of that phrase is where Jesus brings it up, saying that His way (love your enemies, and be kind to those that do your harm) is the right way.  &#8220;An eye for an eye&#8221; comes from Hammurabi&#8217;s code.</p>
<p>Does anyone else get the feeling that the quality of judges in this country has taken a markedly severe drop of late?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14854</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14854</guid>
		<description>Good [censored by ACLU].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good [censored by ACLU].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/good-news-for-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-14853</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/03/28/2265/good-news-for-criminals/#comment-14853</guid>
		<description>More good news for Criminals too...if you&#039;re convinction might have anything to do with...The BIBLE! (HORROR) you can get you sentence commutted too!  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7318241</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More good news for Criminals too&#8230;if you&#8217;re convinction might have anything to do with&#8230;The BIBLE! (HORROR) you can get you sentence commutted too!  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7318241" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7318241</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
