Repeal the 17th?
Todd Zywicki asks if we should repeal the 17th Amendment. I say, why bother going through all the trouble of repealing an amendment, when it’s so much easier to have Cass Sunstein interpret it instead?
Todd Zywicki asks if we should repeal the 17th Amendment. I say, why bother going through all the trouble of repealing an amendment, when it’s so much easier to have Cass Sunstein interpret it instead?
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |






Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.
April 18th, 2005 at 2:28 pm
Rather see them repeal the 16th.
April 18th, 2005 at 5:10 pm
Hell, seventeen led to 18 and 19. I say repeal everything from 16 to 19.
April 18th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
Jimmy Kimmel and Adam Carolla proposed that a few years back, when they conned women into signing a petition to “End Women’s Suffrage,” complete with oil paintings of women with looks of suffering on their faces.
Course, if you pull 16-19, there’s not much point retaining #21, either. Might as well get rid of that one, too, then renumber Amendments 20 and 22-27 to fill in the gaps.
April 24th, 2005 at 8:14 am
Dopey WNJ Letter of the Week
This week’s winner: Kate van Horn of Newark writes this past Monday (my emphasis) My new crusade is ridding the world of neckties. What is more superfluous, uncomfortable and expensive? They have absolutely no function except status? Men, free yoursel…