<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Nukes is Bad Nukes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/04/25/no-nukes-is-bad-nukes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/04/25/no-nukes-is-bad-nukes/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Kalb</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/04/25/no-nukes-is-bad-nukes/comment-page-1/#comment-15410</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Kalb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2005/04/25/no-nukes-is-bad-nukes/#comment-15410</guid>
		<description>Biden did propose a compromise on Sunday (only blocking two judges).

I wouldn&#039;t describe that as being acceptable, but it shows the Dems are giving ground, probably a lot of it, so it might make some tactical sense to meet with them, though any deal not involving well-nigh unconditional surrender doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden did propose a compromise on Sunday (only blocking two judges).</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t describe that as being acceptable, but it shows the Dems are giving ground, probably a lot of it, so it might make some tactical sense to meet with them, though any deal not involving well-nigh unconditional surrender doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

