“Sheehan’s stupidity”
Which is evidenced by exactly what?

Did you even read this entry? I gave plenty of examples. Is it your position that she really doesn’t owe any income tax for the year 2004, the November 2004 election was rigged, or that the U.S. government was behind 9-11? Or that there’s nothing unpatriotic about saying your country isn’t worth dying for?

Actually, since as I understand it she’s already met (not in the Godfather sense, unfortunately, some might quip) with Bush once, and that didn’t seem to go very well, perhaps she’s just decided to give him another chance to make a good impression.

Or perhaps you’re just talking out of your ass. The first meeting went fine, if you believe the statements she made about it at the time. Now she’s saying all kinds of crazy stuff that contradicts what she said then. And you really wonder why President Bush isn’t champing at the bit to meet this moron a second time?

For those having trouble seeing the relevance of the fact her husband has filed for divorce, let me help: it has none.

Except to those who want to divert attention.

So you can stop looking for the relevance.

“another sign”

You nailed it: nearly every woman whose husband files for divorce is a “lunatic”.

“exploitation”

Yeah, that must be it: she’s being exploited. In fact, probably her son isn’t even DEAD. And they really did find WMDs in Iraq. Yes, it’s all a mean trick to make Saint Bush look bad.

As if he needed any help with that project.

Actually, since as I understand it she’s already met (not in the Godfather sense, unfortunately, some might quip) with Bush once, and that didn’t seem to go very well, perhaps she’s just decided to give him another chance to make a good impression.

Bless her heart.

But here’s something that may be ‘relevant’:

1. Conspiracy to commit crimes against peace*
2. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression*

(*Not relevant if you win.)

Recognize them? They’re the first two counts in the Nuremberg indictments.

There’s always a damn asterisk.

Which is evidenced by exactly what?

At least she probably pronounces “nuclear” correctly.

Martyr factor, perhaps? One thing when relatives make a press release. Another thing entirely when your husband files for divorce. Now that her marriage is on the line, she’s going to be “risking everything” for her “cause.” Remember, we’re not talking about some zitty teen with a sign and a bad beard. We’re talking about the next Rosa Parks.

It’s speculation, but I think the divorce may well be playing into her image. No such thing as bad publicity. Me? I see it as another sign that this lady is either a lunatic or a pawn in a very sad game in which one side has absolutely no shame. I don’t doubt that she’s grieving, but I wouldn’t be surprised that she’s being exploited, somehow.

If she is, I’d save my wrath for those behind the exploitation.