<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumb and Dumberererer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ttyler5     Houston</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28692</link>
		<dc:creator>ttyler5     Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 03:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28692</guid>
		<description>I knew it!!!  I knew it!!!

I knew Leahy wore panties!

Of course, it was no secret about Kennedy, though. 

He so often wears them on his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it!!!  I knew it!!!</p>
<p>I knew Leahy wore panties!</p>
<p>Of course, it was no secret about Kennedy, though. </p>
<p>He so often wears them on his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28317</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28317</guid>
		<description>If the restrictive covenant was on the appearance of the house, the news story you linked to was wrong.  It describes it as a restrictive covenant on sales, &lt;i&gt;i.e.,&lt;/i&gt; who you can or cannot seel it to, not what you can or cannot do with it once you&#039;ve purchased it.  It also doesn&#039;t make sense to say &quot;While it had once protected its home values by enforcing restrictive covenants on sales, by the mid-1990s the SMRA began promoting the benefits of its racially integrated, activist, middle-class neighborhood&quot; if the restrictive covenant in question had nothing to do with preventing the neighborhood from becoming racially integrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the restrictive covenant was on the appearance of the house, the news story you linked to was wrong.  It describes it as a restrictive covenant on sales, <i>i.e.,</i> who you can or cannot seel it to, not what you can or cannot do with it once you&#8217;ve purchased it.  It also doesn&#8217;t make sense to say &#8220;While it had once protected its home values by enforcing restrictive covenants on sales, by the mid-1990s the SMRA began promoting the benefits of its racially integrated, activist, middle-class neighborhood&#8221; if the restrictive covenant in question had nothing to do with preventing the neighborhood from becoming racially integrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28315</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28315</guid>
		<description>They could have had to do with homogeneity in the appearance of the houses -- you can&#039;t build another story, or whatever.  As if it matters.

Actus actually asked whether the covenants were only on houses in Victorian Flatbush, as opposed to the rest of Flatbush.  Everyone is out of their minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could have had to do with homogeneity in the appearance of the houses &#8212; you can&#8217;t build another story, or whatever.  As if it matters.</p>
<p>Actus actually asked whether the covenants were only on houses in Victorian Flatbush, as opposed to the rest of Flatbush.  Everyone is out of their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J. Stinson</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28312</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J. Stinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28312</guid>
		<description>I heard John Roberts once forgot to tie his shoes when he went out to play as a child.

I&#039;m off to tell the AP about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard John Roberts once forgot to tie his shoes when he went out to play as a child.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m off to tell the AP about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28303</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28303</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how they could have been anything else.  What other kind of restrictive covenants applied to sales, or had anything to do with the neighborhood&#039;s racial homogeneity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how they could have been anything else.  What other kind of restrictive covenants applied to sales, or had anything to do with the neighborhood&#8217;s racial homogeneity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28298</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28298</guid>
		<description>Actually, I can&#039;t guarantee that the covenants to keep the area homogenous were racial in nature.  Not that it really makes a difference, as I explained in the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I can&#8217;t guarantee that the covenants to keep the area homogenous were racial in nature.  Not that it really makes a difference, as I explained in the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Hoy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/08/17/dumb-and-dumberererer/comment-page-1/#comment-28297</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2525#comment-28297</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly, either Feinstein or Boxer (I think it was Boxer), also had one of these meaningless things on their property. It was a minor embarrassment at the time, but it didn&#039;t really matter because we know that only Republicans do evil things, and not Democrats.

The AP, however, deserves a swift kick in the butt for this one. I just keep shaking my head over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly, either Feinstein or Boxer (I think it was Boxer), also had one of these meaningless things on their property. It was a minor embarrassment at the time, but it didn&#8217;t really matter because we know that only Republicans do evil things, and not Democrats.</p>
<p>The AP, however, deserves a swift kick in the butt for this one. I just keep shaking my head over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

