Comments on: Xrlq Exclusive: School Employees Union Supports Proposition 75!!!!

By: Frank Johnson

Frank Johnson — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:17:14 +0000

Good Service

By: California Conservative » Public Labor Unions Seek to Starve Proposition 75 of Financial Support

Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:25:58 +0000

[...] XRLQ reviews and breaks down a recent mailer he received on all the propositions, including Prop. 75. [...]

By: The Southern California Law Blog » Public Labor Unions Seek to Starve Proposition 75 of Financial Support

Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:33:28 +0000

[...] XRLQ reviews and breaks down a recent mailer he received on all the propositions, including Prop. 75. [...]

By: Terry

Terry — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:40:11 +0000

Seriously, I’m not from California, but everything I’ve read in opposition to Prop. 74 indicates that school administrations are just slavering at the possibly of getting an extra 3 years to fire all the “quality teachers” who apply.

Why are all your school adminstrators such evil bastards?

By: Sean P

Sean P — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:42:31 +0000

According to the Rebuttal to the Argument in favor of Proposition 74, contained in the Official Voter Information Guide, the initiative that gives schools greater leeway to fire incompetent teachers should be rejected because “it will discourage recruitment of the quality teachers we so desparately need.”

I suppose if I had been given a better public school education, that argument would make sense to me.

By: Xrlq

Xrlq — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:30:27 +0000

D’oh! That will teach me to write introsnark to a group of initiatives before having gone through all of them one by one. Entry updated accordingly.

By: aphrael

aphrael — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:44:35 +0000

Since Proposition 76 specifies that the state no longer has to pay back money not paid if it suspends the proposition 98 guarantee, it’s not surprising at all that the public education lobby would oppose it.