<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Machine Gun Sammy Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-38212</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2654#comment-38212</guid>
		<description>The bad news about United States v. Stewart is that the Supreme court remanded it back to the 9th circuit for review in light of Raich.  It really is a beautifully written opinion, it&#039;ll be sad to see it gutted by Raich.


Be careful what you wish for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad news about United States v. Stewart is that the Supreme court remanded it back to the 9th circuit for review in light of Raich.  It really is a beautifully written opinion, it&#8217;ll be sad to see it gutted by Raich.</p>
<p>Be careful what you wish for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Bottom of the ninth</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-37728</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Bottom of the ninth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2654#comment-37728</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, those right-wing extremists who happen to agree with Alito on machine guns, may be split in two: Buried deep in the massive House spending-cut proposal is a provision to do what many conservatives have been wanting to do for years: split up the liberal 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and allow President Bush to appoint some new judges to it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, those right-wing extremists who happen to agree with Alito on machine guns, may be split in two: Buried deep in the massive House spending-cut proposal is a provision to do what many conservatives have been wanting to do for years: split up the liberal 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and allow President Bush to appoint some new judges to it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-37680</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 00:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2654#comment-37680</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Curry: Senate has clear choice in Alito&lt;/strong&gt;

It is symbolic of the Senate battle ahead that one of federal appeals court Judge Samuel Alito?s bes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Curry: Senate has clear choice in Alito</strong></p>
<p>It is symbolic of the Senate battle ahead that one of federal appeals court Judge Samuel Alito?s bes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See-Dubya</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2005/11/03/machine-gun-sammy-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-37624</link>
		<dc:creator>See-Dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=2654#comment-37624</guid>
		<description>Ahem:

&quot;Lone dissent&quot; (indicates the judge dissented from liberal orthodoxy)

&quot;Courageous dissent&quot; (indicates the judge tried to uphold liberal orthodoxy but the idea was just too blinkin&#039; stupid to get a majority.)

Didn&#039;t you get the memo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem:</p>
<p>&#8220;Lone dissent&#8221; (indicates the judge dissented from liberal orthodoxy)</p>
<p>&#8220;Courageous dissent&#8221; (indicates the judge tried to uphold liberal orthodoxy but the idea was just too blinkin&#8217; stupid to get a majority.)</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t you get the memo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

