Being Jess Malkinsbich?

18 Responses to “Being Jess Malkinsbich?”

1. Fran Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 6:39 am

   God, that Michelle is soooooo damn smart and cute!! But then again, all consevatives are….your not going to be able to go up against her and win an arguement so keep on with the name calling….it shows how progressive you lefties are(n’t). Your party is an embarassment to the proud old democrats like Kennedy, et al. I am ashamed and embarassed for you all. Keep up with the movement and we’ll be sure to obliterate your party next election.

2. Xrlq Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 9:38 am

   Me, a lefty? Now that’s good. Judging by your comment, it seems you may have fallen into the great sarchasm.

   You are right about one thing, though: my party is indeed an embarassment to proud old Democrats, proud young Democrats, ashamed old Democrats, ashamed young Democrats, and every other kind of Democrat that has lost so many elections in a row that they were ecstatic to have finally had a few state elections this month in which they didn’t get their asses kicked as usual.

3. auspatriotman Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 10:21 am

   If there’s one thng a Lib hates is a independant female. What’s worse than that is one who has a brain and thinks on her own!!! That’s devastating to a Lib. Why, their Mullahs without the dress code!

   These are the best words I can find for the Libs. It suits them to a tee:

   Ecclesiastes:10:1-3
   1: Dead flies can make a whole bottle of perfume stink, and a little stupidity can cancel out the greatest wisdom
   2: A wise man’s heart {directs him} toward the right, but the foolish man’s heart {directs him} toward the left
   3: Even when a fool goes walking, he has no sense and shows everyone else that he’s a fool.

   Proverbs 18:2: “A fool finds no pleasure in understanding, but delights in airing his own opinions.”

   The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. -Albert Einstein

4. The Liberal Avenger Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 1:49 pm

   Malkin concedes that Michelle Malkin, Inc. is actually Michelle and Jesse Malkin, Inc. That’s what we’ve been saying all along!

   As for the other stuff – deplorable, all of it. “Dirty Asian Whore” isn’t part of my rhetorical toolbox. Barbs like that certainly never came from me.

5. Xrlq Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 1:59 pm

   LA:

   That’s what we’ve been saying all along!

   Funny you should say “we” while linking to an entry of your own that reads all sorts of crap into Michelle Malkin’s use of the royal “we.” Am I to assume you are two or more people, too, or do your Inspector Clouseau theories only apply to conservatives?

6. Dr. Weevil Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 2:25 pm

   It’s worth noting that ‘liberal avenger’ doesn’t restrain himself from quoting the filthy language that supposedly isn’t part of his “rhetorical toolbox”. He could just as easily have made a generic remark about ethnic insults and gross obscenities, but it seems that he prefers to wallow in the filth while pretending to be above it. He did the same in the comments of some other site I saw just a few minutes ago.

7. Hatterly Adams Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 4:54 pm

   Michelle Malkin is a feminist, plain & simple – but why is that so hard for her to admit?

   I am a true Conservative wife and mother and I do not act like her at all, nor do any of my Conservative friends.

   I think the Conservatives who write these blogs have no idea what the meaning of a true Conservative woman is. We are nothing like Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter.

8. Darleen Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 4:57 pm

   One of the reasons the left, as evidenced by LibVenger, can’t get a handle on how Michelle can write on her own and have a good marriage is that they don’t know many good marriages or how to create them. They’ve taken to heart the gender feminist schtick that there is no such thing as a “good” marriage – marriag is just a sexist trap that sucks the IQ points out of women.

   Pity.

9. The Liberal Avenger Says:
   November 20th, 2005 at 7:37 pm

   In my case I used “we” because I collaborated with somebody else on the story.

   Just like Michelle and Jesse collaborate.

   There is nothing wrong with them collaborating. The problem is that they haven’t been up front about it until today. Now that they have come clean with the fact that they collaborate we can move on.

   See, M & J… A little honesty is a GOOD thing every once and awhile.

   P.S. Why did Jesse Malkin savagely beat a student photographer who tried to take his picture? That’s behavior one could only describe as being unhinged.

10. Patterico Says:
    November 20th, 2005 at 7:53 pm

    Liberal Avenger, you lying sack of shit:

    Here is the sum total of the violence attributed to Jesse Malkin by your link — even assuming it to be true, which I don’t: “He grabbed my arm and tried to grab my camera . . .”

    Oh, the violence! What a savage beating!!

    The only savage beating here is the one your credibility takes, every time your fingers tap on a keyboard.

11. Patterico’s Pontifications » “Liberal Avenger”: Dishonest Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 9:23 am

    [...] This is a follow-up to my post yesterday about Michelle Malkin. From what I can tell, the main guy who has been going around claiming that Malkin’s husband is really the one who writes her blog is an anonymous liberal (funny how often personal charges and attacks come from anonymous people) who calls himself the “Liberal Avenger.” Over on Xrlq’s blog, Liberal Avenger shows why he has such a poor reputation for credibility in the blogosphere, with a comment that contains the following false accusation: P.S. Why did Jesse Malkin savagely beat a student photographer who tried to take his picture? That’s behavior one could only describe as being unhinged. [...]

12. Hugo Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 10:08 am

    I’ve posted a defense of Malkin (from a lefty perspective) at my place; XRLQ, you get the hat-tip.

13. DRJ Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 10:32 am

    Hatterly Adams: Your comments sound smug and snarky. My conservative female friends aren’t this way at all. Are you trolling here?

14. Ralph Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 11:31 am

    It’s no secret that the country is polarized. Name calling, character assassination, etc. from both sides (admit it). But Malkin is working to reconcile.

    Michelle’s new book has the potential to help bridge the bitter gap between Republicans and Democrats. After reading this book, expect to see Dems and Repubs finding points on which to agree and form productive working relationships. Rather than insulting one another and fighting for power, representatives will work on bipartisan efforts in the best interests of the country. Ted Kennedy may ask the Roves to be godparents for his grandchildren. It may not seem like much, but this new book is the first step in that direction. Bravo!

15. Scott Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 1:28 pm

    Am I to assume you are two or more people, too, or do your Inspector Clouseau theories only apply to conservatives?

    He was referring to himself and the other chat handles he posts under.

16. Darleen Says:
    November 21st, 2005 at 8:58 pm

    Is it possible “Hatterly” is a moby?

    The “true Conservative woman” schtick rings false.

17. Kathy Says:
    November 22nd, 2005 at 12:30 pm

    Especially if her marks of a ‘true conservative woman’ are to be against outspokenness – how outspoken of her.

18. The Liberal Avenger Says:
    November 26th, 2005 at 3:34 pm

    “We” is Auguste from Malkin(s)Watch and me.

    I have no problem admitting publicly that I was collaborating with someone on that work.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

CommentLuv Enabled

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail