Comments on: Being Jess Malkinsbich?

By: The Liberal Avenger

The Liberal Avenger — Sat, 26 Nov 2005 23:34:54 +0000

"We" is Auguste from Malkin(s)Watch and me. I have no problem admitting publicly that I was collaborating with someone on that work.

By: Kathy

Kathy — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:30:18 +0000

Especially if her marks of a ‘true conservative woman’ are to be against outspokenness – how outspoken of her.

By: Darleen

Darleen — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:58:43 +0000

Is it possible “Hatterly” is a moby?

The “true Conservative woman” schtick rings false.

By: Scott

Scott — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:28:59 +0000

Am I to assume you are two or more people, too, or do your Inspector Clouseau theories only apply to conservatives?

He was referring to himself and the other chat handles he posts under.

By: Ralph

Ralph — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:31:10 +0000

It’s no secret that the country is polarized. Name calling, character assassination, etc. from both sides (admit it). But Malkin is working to reconcile.

Michelle’s new book has the potential to help bridge the bitter gap between Republicans and Democrats. After reading this book, expect to see Dems and Repubs finding points on which to agree and form productive working relationships. Rather than insulting one another and fighting for power, representatives will work on bipartisan efforts in the best interests of the country. Ted Kennedy may ask the Roves to be godparents for his grandchildren. It may not seem like much, but this new book is the first step in that direction. Bravo!

By: DRJ

DRJ — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:32:43 +0000

Hatterly Adams: Your comments sound smug and snarky. My conservative female friends aren’t this way at all. Are you trolling here?

By: Hugo

Hugo — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:08:02 +0000

I’ve posted a defense of Malkin (from a lefty perspective) at my place; XRLQ, you get the hat-tip.

By: Patterico’s Pontifications » “Liberal Avenger”: Dishonest

Patterico’s Pontifications » “Liberal Avenger”: Dishonest — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:23:11 +0000

[...] This is a follow-up to my post yesterday about Michelle Malkin. From what I can tell, the main guy who has been going around claiming that Malkin’s husband is really the one who writes her blog is an anonymous liberal (funny how often personal charges and attacks come from anonymous people) who calls himself the “Liberal Avenger.” Over on Xrlq’s blog, Liberal Avenger shows why he has such a poor reputation for credibility in the blogosphere, with a comment that contains the following false accusation: P.S. Why did Jesse Malkin savagely beat a student photographer who tried to take his picture? That’s behavior one could only describe as being unhinged. [...]

By: Patterico

Patterico — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:53:57 +0000

Liberal Avenger, you lying sack of shit:

Here is the sum total of the violence attributed to Jesse Malkin by your link — even assuming it to be true, which I don’t: “He grabbed my arm and tried to grab my camera . . .”

Oh, the violence! What a savage beating!!

The only savage beating here is the one your credibility takes, every time your fingers tap on a keyboard.

By: The Liberal Avenger

The Liberal Avenger — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:37:26 +0000

In my case I used “we” because I collaborated with somebody else on the story.

Just like Michelle and Jesse collaborate.

There is nothing wrong with them collaborating. The problem is that they haven’t been up front about it until today. Now that they have come clean with the fact that they collaborate we can move on.

See, M & J… A little honesty is a GOOD thing every once and awhile.

P.S. Why did Jesse Malkin savagely beat a student photographer who tried to take his picture? That’s behavior one could only describe as being unhinged.