Roger Mahoney, Constitutional Scholar
Longstanding cardinal/pervert enabler Roger Mahoney has come up with a real whopper of a defense to the latest requests for information on the Catholic Church’s cover-ups. Hidden among the emanations and penumbras of the First Amendment, Mr. Mahoney has discovered a true first: the buggerer-enabler privilege.
February 8th, 2006 at 5:33 pm
xlrq: Buddy, you’re way behind the curve here. The U.S. Supreme Court has already found the sodomy laws unconstitutional. So how far are they from finding it a right? And further, isn’t it just a step from there to finding it a duty to provide accommodation? If they can condemn private homes in Kelo for the needs of commercial businesses, then why not condemn someone’s rear end for the use of those most sorely in need (Andrew Sullivan comes to mind)? You obviously don’t have the brilliant insight in combination with intellectual flexibility and moral fluidity of liberals concerning the “living” constitution.
February 8th, 2006 at 5:40 pm
Sorry. I left out the definition of intellectual flexibility: the ability to think white is white and black is black unless you find it more appealing to believe that white is black and black is white, in which case white really is black and black really is white if you look closely.
February 10th, 2006 at 8:22 am
That’s no penumbra. That’s in the Constitutional Oort Cloud.
February 11th, 2006 at 6:20 pm
Mahoney’s using the famous Dean Wurmer defense of the indefensible. But then a bishop is expected to see things that the rest of us might not.