<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biblical Immigration&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog breeders</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-55703</link>
		<dc:creator>dog breeders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-55703</guid>
		<description>What about the previous post? I think that&#039;s an important note as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the previous post? I think that&#8217;s an important note as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Munn</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53937</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53937</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Another employee (not from Mexico) casually remarked that some day she hoped the whole world spoke her native tongue.&lt;/em&gt;

Okay, I&#039;m guessing she&#039;s from France. Am I right?

(Sorry - couldn&#039;t resist the opportunity to slip in a French joke.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Another employee (not from Mexico) casually remarked that some day she hoped the whole world spoke her native tongue.</em></p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m guessing she&#8217;s from France. Am I right?</p>
<p>(Sorry &#8211; couldn&#8217;t resist the opportunity to slip in a French joke.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53906</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53906</guid>
		<description>A couple thoughts---

Robin, I think I mostly agree with you, I don&#039;t have a problem with people sending money to their family back home, that&#039;s what the good hardworking family person does.  It&#039;s the coming here with no intention to stay, avoiding becoming an American type that gets to me.

It&#039;s funny because where I work, we get a wide variety of immigrants working, and one, who is here temporarily, basically they know that their family will only be here a couple years, speaks pretty flawless English, and in the course of the 2 months she&#039;s been here she&#039;s gone to a monster truck rally, and is trying to get into baseball.  That really struck me and I appreciated the gesture.

Another employee (not from Mexico) casually remarked that some day she hoped the whole world spoke her native tongue.  Now, I don&#039;t begrudge the thought, BUT saying it in America, to a bunch of English speakers, I was kind of like, you&#039;re kidding me right.  But being the not-wanting-to-get-myself-fired type, I held my tongue.  Oh well.

Brad S,-

I think the distinction becomes if the expat is intending to stay or return in the new land, if they are immigranting to find work unavailable in their home, or taking a overseas rotation of some sort. 

If someone is not going to be staying and has a short-term employment arrangement with an employer that is global, the employee has a duty to learn the new culture, but they need not embrace it as their own, because it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple thoughts&#8212;</p>
<p>Robin, I think I mostly agree with you, I don&#8217;t have a problem with people sending money to their family back home, that&#8217;s what the good hardworking family person does.  It&#8217;s the coming here with no intention to stay, avoiding becoming an American type that gets to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny because where I work, we get a wide variety of immigrants working, and one, who is here temporarily, basically they know that their family will only be here a couple years, speaks pretty flawless English, and in the course of the 2 months she&#8217;s been here she&#8217;s gone to a monster truck rally, and is trying to get into baseball.  That really struck me and I appreciated the gesture.</p>
<p>Another employee (not from Mexico) casually remarked that some day she hoped the whole world spoke her native tongue.  Now, I don&#8217;t begrudge the thought, BUT saying it in America, to a bunch of English speakers, I was kind of like, you&#8217;re kidding me right.  But being the not-wanting-to-get-myself-fired type, I held my tongue.  Oh well.</p>
<p>Brad S,-</p>
<p>I think the distinction becomes if the expat is intending to stay or return in the new land, if they are immigranting to find work unavailable in their home, or taking a overseas rotation of some sort. </p>
<p>If someone is not going to be staying and has a short-term employment arrangement with an employer that is global, the employee has a duty to learn the new culture, but they need not embrace it as their own, because it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad S</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53897</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53897</guid>
		<description>As far as immigrants not wanting to assimilate goes, how come that question is never asked of American expats when they shuffle off for various countries? Do Americans of any country of residence get a free pass, as they allegedly are &quot;citizens of the world.&quot; And when was the last time you ever heard about any public OR private school teaching basic &quot;American Values?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as immigrants not wanting to assimilate goes, how come that question is never asked of American expats when they shuffle off for various countries? Do Americans of any country of residence get a free pass, as they allegedly are &#8220;citizens of the world.&#8221; And when was the last time you ever heard about any public OR private school teaching basic &#8220;American Values?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; I&#8217;m confused</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53868</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; I&#8217;m confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53868</guid>
		<description>[...] Joel is blogging at Xrlq&#8217;s and Xrlq is blogging at Patterico&#8217;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joel is blogging at Xrlq&#8217;s and Xrlq is blogging at Patterico&#8217;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53757</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53757</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But of course, people like my friends aren’t in the majority of immigrants, otherwise there wouldn’t be any problem.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m not sure that it matters whether the illegals are the majority or a minority. If a minority, they&#039;re numerous enough that something needs to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But of course, people like my friends aren’t in the majority of immigrants, otherwise there wouldn’t be any problem.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that it matters whether the illegals are the majority or a minority. If a minority, they&#8217;re numerous enough that something needs to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cole</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53716</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 15:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53716</guid>
		<description>Immigration, Yes. 

Colonization, No. 

-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration, Yes. </p>
<p>Colonization, No. </p>
<p>&#8211; Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Munn</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53713</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53713</guid>
		<description>It should probably be noted that sending money back home isn&#039;t the main concern. Plenty of &lt;em&gt;legal&lt;/em&gt; immigrants do so as well. I have a friend from the Philippines who&#039;s been here for over a decade and still sends money back home to his parents -- because that&#039;s his duty as a good son. He quite clearly loves America and wants to assimilate, but that doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s given up his own background either.

The real problem, as you point out in your post, is the people who don&#039;t want to assimilate. They&#039;re not immigrants in any real sense. They&#039;re here only because the jobs are here, but they&#039;d prefer to live in Mexico (or whatever other country they&#039;re from, but most are from Mexico).

Now, the situation starts to get a little more complicated when you consider the people who &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to immigrate and assimilate, but for some reason, the system isn&#039;t working for them. I&#039;ve heard several horror stories about the INS. So I can understand people getting frustrated with the wait and jumping the gun. For example, one husband and wife would have had to be separated for over a year, he in Venezuela and she in America, if they&#039;d followed the rules to the letter. They ended up finding a way to work the system legally (she got nationalized as a Venezuelan resident while they waited for his U.S. citizenship to come through), so they didn&#039;t immigrate illegally. But they were considering it.

But of course, people like my friends aren&#039;t in the majority of immigrants, otherwise there wouldn&#039;t be any problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should probably be noted that sending money back home isn&#8217;t the main concern. Plenty of <em>legal</em> immigrants do so as well. I have a friend from the Philippines who&#8217;s been here for over a decade and still sends money back home to his parents &#8212; because that&#8217;s his duty as a good son. He quite clearly loves America and wants to assimilate, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s given up his own background either.</p>
<p>The real problem, as you point out in your post, is the people who don&#8217;t want to assimilate. They&#8217;re not immigrants in any real sense. They&#8217;re here only because the jobs are here, but they&#8217;d prefer to live in Mexico (or whatever other country they&#8217;re from, but most are from Mexico).</p>
<p>Now, the situation starts to get a little more complicated when you consider the people who <em>want</em> to immigrate and assimilate, but for some reason, the system isn&#8217;t working for them. I&#8217;ve heard several horror stories about the INS. So I can understand people getting frustrated with the wait and jumping the gun. For example, one husband and wife would have had to be separated for over a year, he in Venezuela and she in America, if they&#8217;d followed the rules to the letter. They ended up finding a way to work the system legally (she got nationalized as a Venezuelan resident while they waited for his U.S. citizenship to come through), so they didn&#8217;t immigrate illegally. But they were considering it.</p>
<p>But of course, people like my friends aren&#8217;t in the majority of immigrants, otherwise there wouldn&#8217;t be any problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Spalding</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-53673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Spalding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 05:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/04/01/biblical-immigration/#comment-53673</guid>
		<description>How ironic is it that those in government make the argument that illegal immigrants are just willing to do the jobs Americans don&#039;t want to do when the one job the government seems to be trying hard to avoid doing is dealing with illegal immigration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How ironic is it that those in government make the argument that illegal immigrants are just willing to do the jobs Americans don&#8217;t want to do when the one job the government seems to be trying hard to avoid doing is dealing with illegal immigration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

