Kopel on CCW
David Kopel comments on the status of right-to-carry laws across the country. He replaces the overly simplistic categories of “may issue” vs. “shall issue” with the more informative “do issue,” “shall issue” and “capricious issue.”
David Kopel comments on the status of right-to-carry laws across the country. He replaces the overly simplistic categories of “may issue” vs. “shall issue” with the more informative “do issue,” “shall issue” and “capricious issue.”
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||






Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.
April 4th, 2006 at 7:35 pm
Capricious issue is just a great way to describe the situation in California. You’re probably thrilled that you managed to escape!
April 4th, 2006 at 11:20 pm
Those who disparage Lott should be made to respond to “the lurid and sweeping predictions of opponents have not come true anywhere.” [my emphasis]