Comments on: Careful With That Ass, Eugene http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:32:09 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: nk http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54316 nk Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:03:04 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54316 Sigivald, Absolutely. That's why I found the one girl who did not have them sixteen years ago and have avoided all others since. Sigivald,

Absolutely. That’s why I found the one girl who did not have them sixteen years ago and have avoided all others since.

]]> By: Sigivald http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54314 Sigivald Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:01:05 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54314 nlk: But <i>we live in the age of cooties. Do you realise the risks you're running?</i> nlk: But we live in the age of cooties. Do you realise the risks you’re running?

]]> By: craig mclaughlin http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54313 craig mclaughlin Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:00:05 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54313 Thanks for the Floyd flashback... Thanks for the Floyd flashback…

]]> By: nk http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54190 nk Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:02:07 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54190 Thanks. I banned myself from VC because of too many mind-polluting posts like Mr. Muller's. This "does Michelle Malkin write her own posts" merde is about at the same level "stay away from girls because they have cooties". Thanks. I banned myself from VC because of too many mind-polluting posts like Mr. Muller’s. This “does Michelle Malkin write her own posts” merde is about at the same level “stay away from girls because they have cooties”.

]]> By: Patterico’s Pontifications » Eric Muller: Asshat? http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54188 Patterico’s Pontifications » Eric Muller: Asshat? Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:49:53 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54188 [...] Why, yes. Yes, he is. (’Hat tip to Xrlq, who has an excellent post title.) [...] [...] Why, yes. Yes, he is. (’Hat tip to Xrlq, who has an excellent post title.) [...]

]]> By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54184 Xrlq Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:11:12 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54184 No one should get a pass for anything. I don't like bloggers making idle speculations about the MSM, either. It's not a question of how "sexy" the allegation is, either, but of how credible it is. If Muller had produced any legitimate evidence Malkin was not writing her own posts, that would be one thing. He didn't, so the analogy to NBC trying to provoke a "news" incident is not valid - we have emails showing that they did. No one should get a pass for anything. I don’t like bloggers making idle speculations about the MSM, either. It’s not a question of how “sexy” the allegation is, either, but of how credible it is. If Muller had produced any legitimate evidence Malkin was not writing her own posts, that would be one thing. He didn’t, so the analogy to NBC trying to provoke a “news” incident is not valid – we have emails showing that they did.

]]> By: steve sturm http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/comment-page-1/#comment-54183 steve sturm Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:38:20 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/04/05/careful-with-that-ass-eugene/#comment-54183 OK, X, you've got me. What is so bad about what Muller did? The allegation that Malkin doesn't do all her own posting has been floating around for a while and Muller saw what he thought were postings that were at odds with her travel schedule. He challenged, she replied (and convincingly so), it's over.... at least until someone else comes up with what they think is evidence of her not doing her own posting. Isn't that what the blogosphere prides itself on doing, questioning what others - bloggers, as well as MSM - put out? I hope you're not suggesting that Malkin is due a pass from scrutiny. Granted, this isn't as sexy as the allegation that NBC is looking to provoke a race event at a NASCAR race or that the LA Times manipulates its coverage to make conservatives look bad, but not everything the blogosphere is going to look at is going to rise to that level. BTW, why no preview button for your comments? OK, X, you’ve got me. What is so bad about what Muller did?

The allegation that Malkin doesn’t do all her own posting has been floating around for a while and Muller saw what he thought were postings that were at odds with her travel schedule. He challenged, she replied (and convincingly so), it’s over…. at least until someone else comes up with what they think is evidence of her not doing her own posting.

Isn’t that what the blogosphere prides itself on doing, questioning what others – bloggers, as well as MSM – put out? I hope you’re not suggesting that Malkin is due a pass from scrutiny.

Granted, this isn’t as sexy as the allegation that NBC is looking to provoke a race event at a NASCAR race or that the LA Times manipulates its coverage to make conservatives look bad, but not everything the blogosphere is going to look at is going to rise to that level.

BTW, why no preview button for your comments?

]]>