Comments on: Memo to Cavanaugh: Ignorance and Sarcasm Don’t Mix http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dean's World http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/comment-page-1/#comment-62295 Dean's World Fri, 12 May 2006 17:29:22 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/#comment-62295 <strong>More On the 4th Amendment and the So-Called "Warrantless Wiretaps"...</strong> Ali Eteraz disagrees with me. I left comments over there, but I'll say more here: I can read the 4th amendment just fine....... More On the 4th Amendment and the So-Called “Warrantless Wiretaps”…

Ali Eteraz disagrees with me.

I left comments over there, but I’ll say more here:

I can read the 4th amendment just fine…….

]]> By: Carlos http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/comment-page-1/#comment-61584 Carlos Tue, 09 May 2006 02:53:21 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/#comment-61584 I hope my computer pleads the fifth... As it has caused undue harm to the Englich language. But I would like to see it try and testify! I hope my computer pleads the fifth… As it has caused undue harm to the Englich language. But I would like to see it try and testify!

]]> By: nk http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/comment-page-1/#comment-61583 nk Tue, 09 May 2006 02:36:11 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/#comment-61583 It doesn't look like you're banned anymore. I was going to comment but then I saw your (and others') comments saying the same thing I would say. Well, not exactly. Actually, what I was going to say was "You f#$%^& paparazzi think you have a right to take pictures of me and my family through the windows of my house and publish them but the governement cannot listen in on international calls by terrorists plotting to kill us?. It doesn’t look like you’re banned anymore. I was going to comment but then I saw your (and others’) comments saying the same thing I would say.

Well, not exactly. Actually, what I was going to say was “You f#$%^& paparazzi think you have a right to take pictures of me and my family through the windows of my house and publish them but the governement cannot listen in on international calls by terrorists plotting to kill us?.

]]> By: SayUncle » It was written in invisible ink http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/comment-page-1/#comment-61461 SayUncle » It was written in invisible ink Mon, 08 May 2006 19:00:18 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/05/08/memo-to-cavanaugh-ignorance-and-sarcasm-dont-mix/#comment-61461 [...] Update 2: Xrlqy Wrlqy says I am wrong. I’m inclined to concur. However, I think we use warrants far less often than we should, which is what probable cause refers to. That said, eliminating warrants where we usually would use them (which we’ve done in some cases), rather makes the entire probable cause section rather, err, unimportant. I think that’s a bad idea. Why include the warrant language if it’s not necessary? What am I missing here? [...] [...] Update 2: Xrlqy Wrlqy says I am wrong. I’m inclined to concur. However, I think we use warrants far less often than we should, which is what probable cause refers to. That said, eliminating warrants where we usually would use them (which we’ve done in some cases), rather makes the entire probable cause section rather, err, unimportant. I think that’s a bad idea. Why include the warrant language if it’s not necessary? What am I missing here? [...]

]]>