Missouri (Not) Loving Company
Via Drudge: in the fine tradition of the perfectly-named Supreme Court case, Loving v. Virginia, another couple involving a partner named Loving is suing for their right to cohabit in Missouri. Heh.
Via Drudge: in the fine tradition of the perfectly-named Supreme Court case, Loving v. Virginia, another couple involving a partner named Loving is suing for their right to cohabit in Missouri. Heh.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||





Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.
May 24th, 2006 at 7:05 pm
I thought these kinds of laws were overturned in Moore v East Cleveland
May 24th, 2006 at 8:13 pm
Yes. The city doesn’t have a leg to stand on. It better back off real quick before those legal fees add up.