Comments on: More Greenwald Dishonesty http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-586105 Xrlq Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:25:01 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-586105 Are they related? Are they related?

]]> By: Rachelle http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-586099 Rachelle Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:44:52 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-586099 Robert Greenwald is a fringe, left-wing video maker who was recently de-funded by the George Soros-backed Democracy Alliance. Perhaps due to the fact that he lost his source of funding, Mr. Greenwald is desperately seeking attention for a new video that attacks Koch Industries, Charles Koch, and David Koch. If Mr. Greenwald’s past works are any indication, this current effort will be a partisan hatchet job that has no credibility. Robert Greenwald is a fringe, left-wing video maker who was recently de-funded by the George Soros-backed Democracy Alliance. Perhaps due to the fact that he lost his source of funding, Mr. Greenwald is desperately seeking attention for a new video that attacks Koch Industries, Charles Koch, and David Koch. If Mr. Greenwald’s past works are any indication, this current effort will be a partisan hatchet job that has no credibility.
Rachelle´s last [type] ..How does data recovery work?

]]> By: Anwyn http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-81739 Anwyn Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:11:14 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-81739 I wonder if it's they're taking his word or if they just don't care what he's doing on those other evil blogs. I wonder if it’s they’re taking his word or if they just don’t care what he’s doing on those other evil blogs.

]]> By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-81564 Xrlq Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:27:45 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-81564 No, they're not. As its name suggests, the <i>American</i> Registry for Internet Numbers only controls IP addresses based in America. What you found in Montevideo, Uruguay was not an ISP at all, ARIN's Latin American and Caribbean counterpart, Latin American and Caribbean IP Address Regional Registry. To check an IP addresses controlled by LACNIC, you have to use their whois server, which is conveniently located at <a href="http://whois.lacnic.net/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">whois.lacnic.net.</a> Try both IP addresses there, and you'll find that they both resolve to a single IP, NET Serviços de Comunicação S.A. of São Paulo, Brazil. Nothing weird about that, at all. The only thing that is weird is that Greenwald expects us all to believe he's living with five other guys in Brazil, all of whom have Anglo names, and all of whom just happen to be able to write English natively. Actually, I take that back - for Greenwald to expect his readers to believe something that ludicrous is not weird at all; in fact, it's par for the course. No, what is weird is how many of his readers are taking his word for it. No, they’re not. As its name suggests, the American Registry for Internet Numbers only controls IP addresses based in America. What you found in Montevideo, Uruguay was not an ISP at all, ARIN’s Latin American and Caribbean counterpart, Latin American and Caribbean IP Address Regional Registry. To check an IP addresses controlled by LACNIC, you have to use their whois server, which is conveniently located at whois.lacnic.net. Try both IP addresses there, and you’ll find that they both resolve to a single IP, NET Serviços de Comunicação S.A. of São Paulo, Brazil. Nothing weird about that, at all.

The only thing that is weird is that Greenwald expects us all to believe he’s living with five other guys in Brazil, all of whom have Anglo names, and all of whom just happen to be able to write English natively. Actually, I take that back – for Greenwald to expect his readers to believe something that ludicrous is not weird at all; in fact, it’s par for the course. No, what is weird is how many of his readers are taking his word for it.

]]> By: tgirsch http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-81429 tgirsch Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:27:54 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-81429 Not only are they the same IP, but they're all in <a href="http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl" rel="nofollow">Montevideo, Uruguay</a>! Wow, this is getting weird! Not only are they the same IP, but they’re all in Montevideo, Uruguay! Wow, this is getting weird!

]]> By: Iowa Voice http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-81410 Iowa Voice Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:53:15 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-81410 <strong>Get Ready For The Latest Blog Dustup!...</strong> Heh. A little fancy detective work by some righty bloggers may have Glenn Greenwald looking a little silly. From Patterico: Boy, we sure do have a dedicated Glenn Greenwald fan there. Or should I say “fans”? Because these comments are,... Get Ready For The Latest Blog Dustup!…

Heh. A little fancy detective work by some righty bloggers may have Glenn Greenwald looking a little silly.

From Patterico:

Boy, we sure do have a dedicated Glenn Greenwald fan there.

Or should I say “fans”?

Because these comments are,…

]]> By: Pablo http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/comment-page-1/#comment-81358 Pablo Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:06:31 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/07/20/more-greenwald-dishonesty/#comment-81358 You're just jealous because you don't have a Constitutional litigator sock puppet with a New York Times bestselling book and Senators reading from its comments in very important Senatorish hearings about the bad president. Or, this is simply just Hi-freaking-larious. One of the two. You’re just jealous because you don’t have a Constitutional litigator sock puppet with a New York Times bestselling book and Senators reading from its comments in very important Senatorish hearings about the bad president.

Or, this is simply just Hi-freaking-larious. One of the two.

]]>