<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support Clean Free Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86986</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86986</guid>
		<description>Well, I am trying to help defeat the purpose of a bad law, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;m violating the letter, or even the spirit according to its supporters.  After all, the supporters say &quot;money is not speech.&quot;  OK, then, we&#039;ll just have speech, sans money.

But your point is an interesting one, I will look into it further to make sure what I&#039;m advocating really is a completely legal way to avoid the effects of a bad law, and not an arguably illegal act in itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am trying to help defeat the purpose of a bad law, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m violating the letter, or even the spirit according to its supporters.  After all, the supporters say &#8220;money is not speech.&#8221;  OK, then, we&#8217;ll just have speech, sans money.</p>
<p>But your point is an interesting one, I will look into it further to make sure what I&#8217;m advocating really is a completely legal way to avoid the effects of a bad law, and not an arguably illegal act in itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rampage</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86930</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rampage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86930</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that you are defying the campaign finance reform law. Aren&#039;t you? If not, what is this pertaining to?

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m all in favor of defying that law and if I had ads on my site I would join you, but I was wondering if it&#039;s not the case that a lawyer has a lot more to lose doing this than most people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that you are defying the campaign finance reform law. Aren&#8217;t you? If not, what is this pertaining to?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m all in favor of defying that law and if I had ads on my site I would join you, but I was wondering if it&#8217;s not the case that a lawyer has a lot more to lose doing this than most people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; More sticking it to the incumbent protection act</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86843</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; More sticking it to the incumbent protection act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86843</guid>
		<description>[...] First, Kim. Then me. Then xrlq and Jolie Rouge. Now, two more of joined the pledge that the McCain-Feingold incumbent protection act err Campaign Finance Reform doesn&#8217;t apply to them: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, Kim. Then me. Then xrlq and Jolie Rouge. Now, two more of joined the pledge that the McCain-Feingold incumbent protection act err Campaign Finance Reform doesn&#8217;t apply to them: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86389</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86389</guid>
		<description>How am I defying the law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How am I defying the law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rampage</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86387</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rampage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86387</guid>
		<description>Xrlq, by defying a law backed up by a Supreme Court ruling, are you risking disbarment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xrlq, by defying a law backed up by a Supreme Court ruling, are you risking disbarment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Combating McCain-Feingold</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86302</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Combating McCain-Feingold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86302</guid>
		<description>[...] Xrlq, who apparently takes issue with my use of i.e., makes a similar pledge with some caveats. He supports clean free elections. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Xrlq, who apparently takes issue with my use of i.e., makes a similar pledge with some caveats. He supports clean free elections. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joli Rouge</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86300</link>
		<dc:creator>Joli Rouge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86300</guid>
		<description>Great idea.  I&#039;m definitely in for this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea.  I&#8217;m definitely in for this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86249</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested. But brand-new to blogging. No readership, and currently, no ads. But I&#039;ll keep this in mind as I keep blogging. It&#039;s a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested. But brand-new to blogging. No readership, and currently, no ads. But I&#8217;ll keep this in mind as I keep blogging. It&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-86192</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/08/08/support-clean-free-elections/#comment-86192</guid>
		<description>Cool.  Glad to hear it. There&#039;s a reporter interested in the free ad offer and how blogs are a means after mccain-feingold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  Glad to hear it. There&#8217;s a reporter interested in the free ad offer and how blogs are a means after mccain-feingold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

