<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom to Libel &#8211; Concurring in the Result</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/comment-page-1/#comment-113588</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/#comment-113588</guid>
		<description>BTW, a &quot;Michelle libels xrlq&quot; post on Instapundit would be adequate even if no Instalanche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, a &#8220;Michelle libels xrlq&#8221; post on Instapundit would be adequate even if no Instalanche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/comment-page-1/#comment-113586</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/#comment-113586</guid>
		<description>xrlq--

The CDA has some uses.  Holding bloggers harmless for comment-libel is pretty much necessary for there to be comments.  Yes, the simple quote exclusion goes too far, as it protects even knowing reposters, but I&#039;d rather see that form of error than to see bloggers held strictly liable for things posted in good faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xrlq&#8211;</p>
<p>The CDA has some uses.  Holding bloggers harmless for comment-libel is pretty much necessary for there to be comments.  Yes, the simple quote exclusion goes too far, as it protects even knowing reposters, but I&#8217;d rather see that form of error than to see bloggers held strictly liable for things posted in good faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lucas</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/comment-page-1/#comment-112718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2006/11/22/freedom-to-libel-concurring-in-the-result/#comment-112718</guid>
		<description>Independent &quot;Citizen Journalists&quot; should have the right of Free Speech, as much as the organized band of &quot;Pajams Media&quot; beats their drum of &quot;free speech.&quot; The world is not always a &quot;fair and balanced&quot; place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent &#8220;Citizen Journalists&#8221; should have the right of Free Speech, as much as the organized band of &#8220;Pajams Media&#8221; beats their drum of &#8220;free speech.&#8221; The world is not always a &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

