Comments on: How Much Crow Will a Prager Eat, if a Prager Can Eat Crow? http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:52:35 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Electric Venom » Blog Archive » Snark Hunt - Week 20 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-115681 Electric Venom » Blog Archive » Snark Hunt - Week 20 Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:48:09 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/#comment-115681 [...] Speaking of slow… Xrlq wonders how much crow will a Prager eat if a Prager can eat crow? [...] [...] Speaking of slow… Xrlq wonders how much crow will a Prager eat if a Prager can eat crow? [...]

]]> By: nk http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-115417 nk Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:24 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/#comment-115417 Well, you know, even a blind hog .... ;) Do you remember William Holden in "The Wild Bunch" saying about the railroad detective, "There are some people who just cannot stand to be wrong"? That's what I have always thought about Dennis Prager from the way he treats his interviewees and callers. Well, you know, even a blind hog …. ;)

Do you remember William Holden in “The Wild Bunch” saying about the railroad detective, “There are some people who just cannot stand to be wrong”? That’s what I have always thought about Dennis Prager from the way he treats his interviewees and callers.

]]> By: bains http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-115408 bains Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:20:27 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/#comment-115408 Dennis changed his tune today, marginally, but did admit that his original column was poorly worded (I'd say... sometimes editors are a good thing). Having listened to him for some time, I was a bit surprised last week when he first embarked upon this particular rant. Then again, Prager is correct is pointing out that Ellison himself caused the stir by eschewing the traditional Bible (considered holy, and wholy incomplete by Muslims) for a never before used Koran. If Ellison were an astute politican, indications are that he's not even an astute citizen, would have either quietly supplanted the Bible with the Koran, or publically declared that due to faith constraints, he would place his hand upon the US Constitution while making his vows. Perhaps hindsight aided Dennis' explaination today. As a religious scholar and man of devout faith, he now says his objection is that Ellison is bismirching the fact that this country is founded upon Judea-Christian philosophy by publically choosing to cast vows for public office on a document that has had no impact upon the foundation and growth of this nation. Nice backpeddle. Ellison filled the teapot - Prager blew the tempest. CAIR's response, typically hyperventilated (but plays well a blatently sympathetic MSM). Dennis changed his tune today, marginally, but did admit that his original column was poorly worded (I’d say… sometimes editors are a good thing). Having listened to him for some time, I was a bit surprised last week when he first embarked upon this particular rant. Then again, Prager is correct is pointing out that Ellison himself caused the stir by eschewing the traditional Bible (considered holy, and wholy incomplete by Muslims) for a never before used Koran. If Ellison were an astute politican, indications are that he’s not even an astute citizen, would have either quietly supplanted the Bible with the Koran, or publically declared that due to faith constraints, he would place his hand upon the US Constitution while making his vows.
Perhaps hindsight aided Dennis’ explaination today. As a religious scholar and man of devout faith, he now says his objection is that Ellison is bismirching the fact that this country is founded upon Judea-Christian philosophy by publically choosing to cast vows for public office on a document that has had no impact upon the foundation and growth of this nation. Nice backpeddle.

Ellison filled the teapot – Prager blew the tempest.

CAIR’s response, typically hyperventilated (but plays well a blatently sympathetic MSM).

]]> By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-115392 Xrlq Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:59:54 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/#comment-115392 Sadly, NK, your prediction was <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2006/12/05/a_response_to_my_many_critics_-_and_a_solution" rel="nofollow">correct.</a> Sadly, NK, your prediction was correct.

]]> By: nk http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/comment-page-1/#comment-115199 nk Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:49:08 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2006/12/04/how-much-crow-will-a-prager-eat-if-a-prager-can-eat-crow/#comment-115199 He is going to use the John Kerry approach. "We are the ones who are not bright enough to understand his point. He was not talking about the Constitution. He was talking about Elliston, the media and the public generally who lack the intellectual and moral capacity to have the correct opinion on the issue -- Dennis Prager's." He is going to use the John Kerry approach. “We are the ones who are not bright enough to understand his point. He was not talking about the Constitution. He was talking about Elliston, the media and the public generally who lack the intellectual and moral capacity to have the correct opinion on the issue — Dennis Prager’s.”

]]>