damnum absque injuria

5/27/2007

The Six Dollar Thicklawsuit

Filed under:   by Xrlq @ 12:35 am

When I first read this, I thought Ted Frank had missed the point of this suit. Surely I’m not the only person who recognizes the ad in question as an obvious rip-off of Carl’s Jr.’s ad a few years back about a chicken’s lack of nuggets, and while a copyright or trademark suit would still seem a bit of a stretch, it would not be nearly as retarded as the suit they really are bringing. Lordy.

5 Responses to “The Six Dollar Thicklawsuit”

  1. Ted Says:

    I don’t recall the Carl’s Jr. commercial you’re referring to, but Wendy’s had a nuggets commercial like you describe in the 1980s, back before they had nuggets themselves, done in the same style as the where’s-the-beef ads. (”All the parts are fused into one big part, which is cut up into little-pieces parts. And parts is parts.”)

  2. Xrlq Says:

    Well, that would explain KCE not making an issue of the rip-off angle, as it suggests the current ad is not just a rip-off, but a rip-off of a rip-off.

  3. Doc Rampage Says:

    Geeze, could you really sue someone just for making an ad that uses the same joke as an ad you made? Not even the same joke; the same joke sketch. I thought copyright infringement required copying actual material, not just ideas.

    But I suppose jokes could be patented: Patent application for a process to make people laugh by way of an anecdote involving a camel and a troop of the French foreign legion…

  4. Steverino Says:

    Carl’s Jr. has an angus burger? I thought that was Burger King. I need to eat more fast food to stay in touch with these trends.

  5. McGehee Says:

    Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s had Angus burgers before BK, IIRC.

    Not very long before, but…

Leave a Reply

 

Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.