<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-378542</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-378542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m cool with &lt;i&gt;y&#039;all,&lt;/i&gt; when it&#039;s used in the plural.  We need a pronoun for that.  Using it in the singular, however, just plain grates.  I put the singular &lt;i&gt;y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; in the same category as the royal &lt;i&gt;we&lt;/i&gt; (first person singular, for use by those who take themselves way too seriously), the smarmy &lt;i&gt;we&lt;/i&gt; (second or third person singular or plural, as in &quot;Why do &#039;we&#039; support Policy X, which I hate&quot; or &quot;My, aren&#039;t &#039;we&#039; a ray of *&amp;^%ing sunshine) and the politically correct &lt;i&gt;they&lt;/i&gt; (third person singular, used to avoid saying &lt;i&gt;he&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;she&lt;/i&gt; at all costs).

Then again, I&#039;m one of those kooks who would rehabilitate &lt;i&gt;ain&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; as a first person signular contraction only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m cool with <i>y&#8217;all,</i> when it&#8217;s used in the plural.  We need a pronoun for that.  Using it in the singular, however, just plain grates.  I put the singular <i>y&#8217;all</i> in the same category as the royal <i>we</i> (first person singular, for use by those who take themselves way too seriously), the smarmy <i>we</i> (second or third person singular or plural, as in &#8220;Why do &#8216;we&#8217; support Policy X, which I hate&#8221; or &#8220;My, aren&#8217;t &#8216;we&#8217; a ray of *&#038;^%ing sunshine) and the politically correct <i>they</i> (third person singular, used to avoid saying <i>he</i> or <i>she</i> at all costs).</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m one of those kooks who would rehabilitate <i>ain&#8217;t</i> as a first person signular contraction only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-377571</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-377571</guid>
		<description>&quot;Y&#039;all&quot; has always bugged me, and I never thought anything could be worse, until I encountered &quot;ya&#039;ll.&quot;  But worse than that, I&#039;ve encountered a blog commenter who consistently types &quot;ca&#039;nt&quot; -- ugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Y&#8217;all&#8221; has always bugged me, and I never thought anything could be worse, until I encountered &#8220;ya&#8217;ll.&#8221;  But worse than that, I&#8217;ve encountered a blog commenter who consistently types &#8220;ca&#8217;nt&#8221; &#8212; ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-377207</link>
		<dc:creator>virgil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-377207</guid>
		<description>#7 should be defining exact dimensions of
the &quot;grits line&quot; viz Mason-Dixon.  That is to say, that part of the U.S. below which one automatically is served grits with eggs
for breakfast instead of hash browns. I maintain the line begins in D.C. and travels west through southern two-thirds of W.Va, southern Ohio{the rural parts only}hits So.Ind.{the very tip and again mostly rural, towns dir. opposite Louisville such as New
Albany, Clarksville&amp; Jeffersonville 2/3 Hashbrown--same for Evansville).  The Ill. border presents an even greater defini- tional delimma. Most people don&#039;t realize that the northern part is further North than N.J., while the southern tip(&quot;little Egypt&quot;where peaches are grown) is further south than almost all of KY &amp; So. third of Va.
SOOO....problem is most people in North consider everything from Springfield on down to be &quot;Southern&quot; while those in South call everyone north of, say, Mt. Vernon &quot;Yankees.&quot; Truth be told, the space between
the two (Central Ill.)is the &quot;DMZ&quot; of the grits line wherein cornbread&amp;beans, oakra and So. fried chicken coexist with ruhbarb pie, otherwise completely bland food and other distinctly northern delights.

From Ill. Gritz line plunges down through 
central Mizzou, bisecting both Okla. and Texas NE to SW in its downward plunge and
terminating near Del Rio Texas. As someone who grew up in E. Central Ill., lived for 20 yrs in Louisville, and took my AF pilot tng at Laughlin AFB in Del Rio, I know whereof I speak. Annybody wanna argue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7 should be defining exact dimensions of<br />
the &#8220;grits line&#8221; viz Mason-Dixon.  That is to say, that part of the U.S. below which one automatically is served grits with eggs<br />
for breakfast instead of hash browns. I maintain the line begins in D.C. and travels west through southern two-thirds of W.Va, southern Ohio{the rural parts only}hits So.Ind.{the very tip and again mostly rural, towns dir. opposite Louisville such as New<br />
Albany, Clarksville&amp; Jeffersonville 2/3 Hashbrown&#8211;same for Evansville).  The Ill. border presents an even greater defini- tional delimma. Most people don&#8217;t realize that the northern part is further North than N.J., while the southern tip(&#8220;little Egypt&#8221;where peaches are grown) is further south than almost all of KY &amp; So. third of Va.<br />
SOOO&#8230;.problem is most people in North consider everything from Springfield on down to be &#8220;Southern&#8221; while those in South call everyone north of, say, Mt. Vernon &#8220;Yankees.&#8221; Truth be told, the space between<br />
the two (Central Ill.)is the &#8220;DMZ&#8221; of the grits line wherein cornbread&amp;beans, oakra and So. fried chicken coexist with ruhbarb pie, otherwise completely bland food and other distinctly northern delights.</p>
<p>From Ill. Gritz line plunges down through<br />
central Mizzou, bisecting both Okla. and Texas NE to SW in its downward plunge and<br />
terminating near Del Rio Texas. As someone who grew up in E. Central Ill., lived for 20 yrs in Louisville, and took my AF pilot tng at Laughlin AFB in Del Rio, I know whereof I speak. Annybody wanna argue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-375355</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-375355</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;7. ???&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

8. &lt;b&gt;PROFIT!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>7. ???</i></p></blockquote>
<p>8. <b>PROFIT!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr T</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-374455</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-374455</guid>
		<description>y&#039;all is a clear plural, just like vosotros in Spanish. Improper, colloquial usage will present a singular. The war will start over the definition of winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y&#8217;all is a clear plural, just like vosotros in Spanish. Improper, colloquial usage will present a singular. The war will start over the definition of winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stashiu3</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-373947</link>
		<dc:creator>Stashiu3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-373947</guid>
		<description>7.  Microsoft vs. Apple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.  Microsoft vs. Apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-373462</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-373462</guid>
		<description>1 - KK, naturally

2 - both suck

3 - 1

And there can be no peace between our people until you embrace y&#039;all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; KK, naturally</p>
<p>2 &#8211; both suck</p>
<p>3 &#8211; 1</p>
<p>And there can be no peace between our people until you embrace y&#8217;all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Baker</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-369588</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-369588</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; is singular.

&lt;i&gt;All y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; is plural.

Damnyankee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Y&#8217;all</i> is singular.</p>
<p><i>All y&#8217;all</i> is plural.</p>
<p>Damnyankee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-367788</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-367788</guid>
		<description>My theory is that &lt;i&gt;y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; is usually plural, and always plural when preceded by &lt;i&gt;all.&lt;/i&gt; but that the preceding &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; is neither emphatic nor a plural marker.  Rather, it&#039;s just a good old fashioned &quot;all,&quot; there to clarify that when I say &lt;i&gt;y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; I really mean &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of y&#039;all, not just some of y&#039;all.  And that&#039;s not limited to &lt;i&gt;y&#039;all&lt;/i&gt; or the South.  We all do the same with other plural pronouns, as I just did myself by saying &quot;we all.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My theory is that <i>y&#8217;all</i> is usually plural, and always plural when preceded by <i>all.</i> but that the preceding <i>all</i> is neither emphatic nor a plural marker.  Rather, it&#8217;s just a good old fashioned &#8220;all,&#8221; there to clarify that when I say <i>y&#8217;all</i> I really mean <i>all</i> of y&#8217;all, not just some of y&#8217;all.  And that&#8217;s not limited to <i>y&#8217;all</i> or the South.  We all do the same with other plural pronouns, as I just did myself by saying &#8220;we all.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/comment-page-1/#comment-367008</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/2008/02/16/poll/#comment-367008</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;all is both singular and plural,though all y&#039;all is only plural; it is not redundant, but emphatic.

Youse is not plural; it&#039;s possessive.  You&#039;uns can only be used when addresing some damned Yankee who has used we&#039;uns, or perhaps -- on rare occasions -- youse guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all is both singular and plural,though all y&#8217;all is only plural; it is not redundant, but emphatic.</p>
<p>Youse is not plural; it&#8217;s possessive.  You&#8217;uns can only be used when addresing some damned Yankee who has used we&#8217;uns, or perhaps &#8212; on rare occasions &#8212; youse guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

