<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Dictatorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:52:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-404517</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-404517</guid>
		<description>I changed my mind.  I can do it if I&#039;m a dictator.&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=qff098NCNDE&amp;feature=related&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My new dictatorship&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed my mind.  I can do it if I&#8217;m a dictator.<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=qff098NCNDE&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">My new dictatorship</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ride Fast</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-404261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ride Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-404261</guid>
		<description>Naw, its &quot;Criminal jury acquittals would be appealable.&quot; Endless prosecutions? Double jeopardy becomes a quaint anchoritism?

Also, your right, all dictators are scary, me included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naw, its &#8220;Criminal jury acquittals would be appealable.&#8221; Endless prosecutions? Double jeopardy becomes a quaint anchoritism?</p>
<p>Also, your right, all dictators are scary, me included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-404051</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-404051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;let’s outlaw the word “fair” altogether.&lt;/i&gt;

fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>let’s outlaw the word “fair” altogether.</i></p>
<p>fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ride Fast</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-404017</link>
		<dc:creator>Ride Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-404017</guid>
		<description>[...] If I were dick, I mean Temporary Supreme President for Life [...]

May I suggest something in a black uniform with silver bunting for your coronation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If I were dick, I mean Temporary Supreme President for Life [...]</p>
<p>May I suggest something in a black uniform with silver bunting for your coronation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403990</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403990</guid>
		<description>All right, all right, I’ll play. No male over the age of twelve may wear short pants. Females of all ages get a tax credit for summer dresses in any kind of weather.

(Crossposted at Uncle&#039;s.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, all right, I’ll play. No male over the age of twelve may wear short pants. Females of all ages get a tax credit for summer dresses in any kind of weather.</p>
<p>(Crossposted at Uncle&#8217;s.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403988</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403988</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d settle for open both, but given the choice between one or the other, concealed is better.  Open carry is a great idea in principle, but in practice, it inevitably leads to PSH-induced arrests.  Besides, why tip the bad guys off as to who is armed, and where exactly they have to grab in order to disarm them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d settle for open both, but given the choice between one or the other, concealed is better.  Open carry is a great idea in principle, but in practice, it inevitably leads to PSH-induced arrests.  Besides, why tip the bad guys off as to who is armed, and where exactly they have to grab in order to disarm them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cactus Jack</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403925</link>
		<dc:creator>Cactus Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403925</guid>
		<description>&quot;6 National CCW&quot;

Fine and dandy but national OPEN CARRY would be much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;6 National CCW&#8221;</p>
<p>Fine and dandy but national OPEN CARRY would be much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403850</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403850</guid>
		<description>Daryl, I would of course!  That&#039;s one of the perks of being dictator.

Phelps, maybe another tweak to the First Amendment would be needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl, I would of course!  That&#8217;s one of the perks of being dictator.</p>
<p>Phelps, maybe another tweak to the First Amendment would be needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Another Dictator</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403805</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Another Dictator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403805</guid>
		<description>[...] Xrlqy Wrlqy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Xrlqy Wrlqy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Herbert</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/03/my-dictatorship/comment-page-1/#comment-403673</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3390#comment-403673</guid>
		<description>The problem with #2 is, who determines &quot;truth&quot;?

There are plenty of lefties out there who want to shut down Fox News for supposedly spreading horrible lies--what happens when they get into power?

And how do you deal with the fact that activists on both sides consider 99% of the politicians on the other side to be lying every time they open their mouths?

#2 is a recipe for disaster.  SCOTUS has already said it&#039;s unconstitutional because it would just be used to keep the opposition out of office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with #2 is, who determines &#8220;truth&#8221;?</p>
<p>There are plenty of lefties out there who want to shut down Fox News for supposedly spreading horrible lies&#8211;what happens when they get into power?</p>
<p>And how do you deal with the fact that activists on both sides consider 99% of the politicians on the other side to be lying every time they open their mouths?</p>
<p>#2 is a recipe for disaster.  SCOTUS has already said it&#8217;s unconstitutional because it would just be used to keep the opposition out of office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
