<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Big Gay Marriage Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Story, J. (Ret.)</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-407109</link>
		<dc:creator>Story, J. (Ret.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3405#comment-407109</guid>
		<description>The act of homosexuality is immoral, abominable, a crime against the common law, a crime against nature and of Nature&#039;s God. No civil authority has the authority to call it a right. I suppose it will soon become a right to marry one&#039;s dog or cow. Or maybe it will be acceptable to marry one&#039;s own sibling or child? How perverted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The act of homosexuality is immoral, abominable, a crime against the common law, a crime against nature and of Nature&#8217;s God. No civil authority has the authority to call it a right. I suppose it will soon become a right to marry one&#8217;s dog or cow. Or maybe it will be acceptable to marry one&#8217;s own sibling or child? How perverted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Lawn</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-407030</link>
		<dc:creator>On Lawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3405#comment-407030</guid>
		<description>Charlotte,

Your post is right, but that was about all that was.

I agree everyone does have a right to marriage. I even agree that other combinations other than man+woman should have access to provisions and entitlements that are reserved for marriage.

Marriage is our social institution around our individual rights to combine in the capacity to create children. It also wraps in the rights of children to have access to their heritage, and be raised in a loving marriage by the two people who combined to create them.

Saying everyone has a right to something is not served by substituting it with something else. If we all have a right to free speech, we are not served by redefining free speech to mean &quot;whatever the government wants you to say&quot;, or any other re-definition. All the needy non-marriageable family combinations (of which Homosexuals are a vast minority) are not served by re-defining marriage. Neither are homosexuals, who are the chief purveyors and customers of the counterfeit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlotte,</p>
<p>Your post is right, but that was about all that was.</p>
<p>I agree everyone does have a right to marriage. I even agree that other combinations other than man+woman should have access to provisions and entitlements that are reserved for marriage.</p>
<p>Marriage is our social institution around our individual rights to combine in the capacity to create children. It also wraps in the rights of children to have access to their heritage, and be raised in a loving marriage by the two people who combined to create them.</p>
<p>Saying everyone has a right to something is not served by substituting it with something else. If we all have a right to free speech, we are not served by redefining free speech to mean &#8220;whatever the government wants you to say&#8221;, or any other re-definition. All the needy non-marriageable family combinations (of which Homosexuals are a vast minority) are not served by re-defining marriage. Neither are homosexuals, who are the chief purveyors and customers of the counterfeit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-406954</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3405#comment-406954</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;California Overturns Gay Marriage Ban...&lt;/strong&gt;

The California Supreme Court has overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>California Overturns Gay Marriage Ban&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The California Supreme Court has overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/05/17/on-the-big-gay-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-406944</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3405#comment-406944</guid>
		<description>Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans if they choose. If you have such a problem with this check out our trailer. Produced to educate &amp; defuse the controversy it has a way of opening closed minds &amp; provides some sanity on the issue: http://www.OUTTAKEonline.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans if they choose. If you have such a problem with this check out our trailer. Produced to educate &amp; defuse the controversy it has a way of opening closed minds &amp; provides some sanity on the issue: <a href="http://www.OUTTAKEonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.OUTTAKEonline.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

