<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow.  Just, Wow.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-448288</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-448288</guid>
		<description>No more pretentious than believing one ought to be the leader of the free world, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more pretentious than believing one ought to be the leader of the free world, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447394</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447394</guid>
		<description>I agree, dwelling too much on the issue of significant legislation may not be a wise strategy.  McCain&#039;s name appears on several other significant bills, too, none of them good from a Republican perspective (or mine).  But Palin&#039;s point wasn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;just&lt;/i&gt; that Obama had not authored any major laws or reforms, but that he &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; authored two memoirs anyway.  That&#039;s just a weeeeee bit pretentious, dontcha think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, dwelling too much on the issue of significant legislation may not be a wise strategy.  McCain&#8217;s name appears on several other significant bills, too, none of them good from a Republican perspective (or mine).  But Palin&#8217;s point wasn&#8217;t <i>just</i> that Obama had not authored any major laws or reforms, but that he <i>had</i> authored two memoirs anyway.  That&#8217;s just a weeeeee bit pretentious, dontcha think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447383</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447383</guid>
		<description>Har har, but the point remains that if the bipartisan legislation Obama co-sponsored can&#039;t be considered a &quot;significant&quot; reform or &quot;significant&quot; legislation, then pretty much no legislation since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 could be.  What &quot;significant&quot; legislation has McCain been responsible for lately?  Bring up McCain-Feingold, that would be a &lt;i&gt;great&lt;/i&gt; idea to energize the base!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Har har, but the point remains that if the bipartisan legislation Obama co-sponsored can&#8217;t be considered a &#8220;significant&#8221; reform or &#8220;significant&#8221; legislation, then pretty much no legislation since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 could be.  What &#8220;significant&#8221; legislation has McCain been responsible for lately?  Bring up McCain-Feingold, that would be a <i>great</i> idea to energize the base!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447156</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447156</guid>
		<description>Gee, I didn&#039;t realize that Obama had personally disarmed North Korea and Iran and stopped nuclear proliferation in its tracks.  Loaves and fishes, schmoaves and schmishes, that was a REAL miracle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I didn&#8217;t realize that Obama had personally disarmed North Korea and Iran and stopped nuclear proliferation in its tracks.  Loaves and fishes, schmoaves and schmishes, that was a REAL miracle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447123</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447123</guid>
		<description>Gee, I guess I didn&#039;t realize that nuclear nonproliferation and ethics reform were &quot;crappy&quot; agenda items.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I guess I didn&#8217;t realize that nuclear nonproliferation and ethics reform were &#8220;crappy&#8221; agenda items.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447091</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Clinton, Obama agree on roll call vote, but tensions remain...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama agreed Monday to limit a divisive roll call for president, g...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Clinton, Obama agree on roll call vote, but tensions remain&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama agreed Monday to limit a divisive roll call for president, g&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447064</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447064</guid>
		<description>Whoever said that delivering frilly speeches was a bad thing?  Certainly not I.  The problem with Obama isn&#039;t that he delivers frilly speeches, it&#039;s that aside from pushing a totally crappy agenda, that&#039;s &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; he does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever said that delivering frilly speeches was a bad thing?  Certainly not I.  The problem with Obama isn&#8217;t that he delivers frilly speeches, it&#8217;s that aside from pushing a totally crappy agenda, that&#8217;s <i>all</i> he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447060</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447060</guid>
		<description>P.S.  On this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;why not cover all the bases and have at least one debate between Palin and Obama, and another between Biden and McCain?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I actually think that would be kind of fun.  And neither party would ever go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  On this:</p>
<blockquote><p>why not cover all the bases and have at least one debate between Palin and Obama, and another between Biden and McCain?</p></blockquote>
<p>I actually think that would be kind of fun.  And neither party would ever go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/04/wow-just-wow/comment-page-1/#comment-447059</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3604#comment-447059</guid>
		<description>Wait, a couple of weeks ago, wasn&#039;t a frilly speech that lacks substance a &lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt; thing?  I&#039;m confused...

And of course, it doesn&#039;t matter that it was mostly bullshit -- it only matters that it was bullshit that Republicans want to hear.

Meanwhile, I highly recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&amp;title=sarah-palin-gender-card&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this Daily Show video&lt;/a&gt;.  Stewart&#039;s right: what does &lt;i&gt;she&lt;/i&gt; know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, a couple of weeks ago, wasn&#8217;t a frilly speech that lacks substance a <i>bad</i> thing?  I&#8217;m confused&#8230;</p>
<p>And of course, it doesn&#8217;t matter that it was mostly bullshit &#8212; it only matters that it was bullshit that Republicans want to hear.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I highly recommend <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&amp;title=sarah-palin-gender-card" rel="nofollow">this Daily Show video</a>.  Stewart&#8217;s right: what does <i>she</i> know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

