Shut Up and Don’t Sing
First Petty Tom scores irony points for getting Dubya to back down from playing “I Won’t Back Down.” Then some washed up has-been from the 1970s connipted over Mike Huckabee and a former bandmate performing one of his songs. Now, two more washed up has-beens from the 1970s are equally pissy about the fact that after all these years, some members of the wrong political party still like their songs and want to play them every now and then. That leaves only two of my possible Sarah Palin tunes in the running:
- (#7) Not “Barracuda,” but only because the Wilson sisters
taketook a cue from Boston and Petty Tom and get pissy. - (#9) “Barracuda,’ and if the Wilson bitches don’t like it, they can sue my near-perfect ass.”
Much as I like Option 9, it ain’t gonna happen. However, there is a third option worth considering. Parodies are the one area of copyright law where the RIAA Gestapo has yet to take over, and the Wilson sisters’ screechy vocals are more suited to a Hillary Clinton rally, anyway, so why not have a better vocalist (read: half of the female population) sing new lyrics while an accomplished guitarist who doesn’t hate Republicans (say, Ted Nugent or Sammy Hagar, or maybe even Eddie Van Palin Halen if he was sufficiently flattered by Trig’s name) play a better version of the famous riff than any of Heart’s assorted guitarists ever could? Lyrics could go something like this:
So this is the end -
Your lawyers weighed in today
Told us to turn ol’ Heart away.
Whined like The One -
Straight on, for real
Strange babies never fail.Alone, lying low, for decades now
Nothing at all sold in decades.
Who will you run to, to turn back the page?
Now that would be, Sarahcuda.Back in the day we all played
Unchained melodies
It’s time to even it up
No right no wrong, selling a song
But not to Republicans.And since the real thing won’t do the trick
We went and made up something quick
We woulda paid you big, if you weren’t such a … jerk
Tooooooooooo Sarahcuda.Never sell me, the has-been said
Little queens, save your pretty heads
You…you’re going crazy on you, too.All that night and all the next
Played without saying “please?”
If looks could kill you’d just – make us ill.And if a lawsuit don’t do the trick
Your Magic Man better find something quick
Or he’s gonna burn burn, burn these dreams to the wick
Ooooooohhhh, Sarah Barracuda.Hoooooooooooooope.
UPDATE: I almost forgot Jackass Browne, who’s running so empty he apparently can’t tell a trademark from a copyright. Thanks to commenters TGirsch and Anwyn for the reminder and the link, respectively.





September 5th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Hey, you forgot to ridicule Jackson Browne. And he even sued.
September 5th, 2008 at 6:05 pm
I heard about that, but don’t know the details. I can’t picture any song of his fitting a campaign nearly as well as “Barracuda” does for Sarachcuda, though.
September 5th, 2008 at 7:37 pm
I’m afraid that John McCain and Sarah Palin are just going to have to content themselves with rockin’ out with some of those crazy Pat Boone tunes.
September 6th, 2008 at 10:48 am
It was “Running on Empty” and HuffPo called Browne a “McCain scourge” for filing the lawsuit. Hahahahahaa.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/08/15/browne-v-mccain-political-rocker-sues-politico-over-running-on-empty/
I hope Dubya or any other Repub never did and never *does* use “I Won’t Back Down.” Can you think of any song that more belies its title line in the complacent little tired, wimpy way the singer sings it and the song in general is written?
September 6th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Dubya did use the song in 2000, but stopped when Petty Tom whined about it.
September 6th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Bear in mind that the only purpose for which Congress is authorised by the constitution to grant copyrights is to encourage people to create new works. So the crucial question here should be, had the songwriters known that their work would be used in this manner (the appropriate ASCAP license fee having been paid) would they have been dissuaded from writing the song? The answer is obviously no, they would have written it anyway. Therefore to whatever extent the copyright can be argued to prevent this use of the song, it’s unconstitutional.
September 6th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Put another way: Would allowing artists to prevent their songs from being used in political campaigns with which they disagree cause even one more song to be written? If not, then Congress is not authorised to grant artists this right.
September 7th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
Well, we dealt with justification clauses in the Second Amendment and it’s better not to go there. Even without the explicit power, the Copyright Act would stand up under the Commerce Clause these days. “Limited time” is more fruitful and the First Amendment even more so.
September 8th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
They were fine with allowing the song to be used to sell minivans. Of course I’m sure Honda pays a lot better. So they’re happy to be used to sell minivans to soccer moms…as long as those moms don’t get all uppity and run for office.