<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Simple Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2008/09/22/two-simple-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/22/two-simple-questions/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/22/two-simple-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-450597</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3771#comment-450597</guid>
		<description>&quot;At least as reliable as Snopes&quot; ain&#039;t sayin&#039; much.  The full name can be useful (doesn&#039;t Bill Ayers have an Annenberg connection, too?) but &quot;hack check&quot; is much shorter.  Then again, so is &quot;Annenberg Political,&quot; which pretty well sums up what they&#039;re about this year.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At least as reliable as Snopes&#8221; ain&#8217;t sayin&#8217; much.  The full name can be useful (doesn&#8217;t Bill Ayers have an Annenberg connection, too?) but &#8220;hack check&#8221; is much shorter.  Then again, so is &#8220;Annenberg Political,&#8221; which pretty well sums up what they&#8217;re about this year.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milhouse</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/22/two-simple-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-450590</link>
		<dc:creator>Milhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3771#comment-450590</guid>
		<description>Whenever you mention this organisation, please give its full name: &lt;b&gt;Annenberg&lt;/b&gt; Political Fact Check.  Yes, the same Annenberg as in the Annenberg Challenge, whose chairman was by the sheerest coincidence one Barack Obama.  In most elections APFC is generally reliable &#8212; at least as reliable as Snopes, anyway &#8212; but in this election one simply can&#039;t ignore the fact that one of the candidates is &quot;one of their own&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever you mention this organisation, please give its full name: <b>Annenberg</b> Political Fact Check.  Yes, the same Annenberg as in the Annenberg Challenge, whose chairman was by the sheerest coincidence one Barack Obama.  In most elections APFC is generally reliable &mdash; at least as reliable as Snopes, anyway &mdash; but in this election one simply can&#8217;t ignore the fact that one of the candidates is &#8220;one of their own&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Unmitigated Garbage from FactCheck.org on Obama&#8217;s Second Amendment Record</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2008/09/22/two-simple-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-450589</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Unmitigated Garbage from FactCheck.org on Obama&#8217;s Second Amendment Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=3771#comment-450589</guid>
		<description>[...] Xrlq points us to this ridiculous FactCheck.org piece on Obama and gun rights. I am by now completely disenchanted with FactCheck.org and virtually every other &#8220;fact checking&#8221; site out there, and this piece does nothing to dispel my depression. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Xrlq points us to this ridiculous FactCheck.org piece on Obama and gun rights. I am by now completely disenchanted with FactCheck.org and virtually every other &#8220;fact checking&#8221; site out there, and this piece does nothing to dispel my depression. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

