I think the words that Palin used “(in charge of the senate”) are sketchy. I would argue that “to preside” does not mean to “be in charge of”. For example, the president of the school board isn’t in charge of that body. He’s a voting member that helps move the agenda along, but he isn’t the master.

Of course, the great irony here is that the left has saddled Bush, “the president”, with tremendous blame for being “the president”. When Katrina hit, it was Bush’s fault, according to the rabid left, because he is “the president”. That means he is in charge. When the Iraq war went south, it was Bush’s fault, because he is “the president” and is in charge. Same with the economy, unemployment, the stock market, oil prices, crime, education… you name it. The same people, though, claim that “president” is just a fancy title regarding the VP, and the VP, as “president” of the senate, isn’t in charge of anything. It’s amazing how some of this double speak works.

largebill´s last blog post..Texas Tech 39 & Texas 33

“I am obliged to confess I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University.” –William F. Buckley, Jr.

McCain spent the past 8 years annoying conservatives, and only got the nomination because of A) a weak field of opponents and B) he does have his own hard-core base.

As a result, many or most conservatives where decidedly unenthusiastic about McCain after he secured the nomination. Selecting Romney, Pawlenty, Huckabee, or anyone else would not have fired up the base.

George Will represents a brand of conservatism whose day has come and gone.

Tom the Redhunter´s last blog post..Barack Obama’s Energy Plan: Let’s Bankrupt Any New Coal Plants

2 geroge will did not smash the window of cars that had obama signs

FUCK YOU bastards

patrick´s last blog post..Obama on “redistributive change”