Comments on: How Democrats Win Elections

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:57:33 +0000

There's disagreement as to whether it qualifies as a "push poll" but general agreement that it was crap. tgirsch´s last blog post..Soda? Pop? Coke?

By: Xrlq

Xrlq — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:35:32 +0000

Make up your mind. The first link alleges it was a push poll. The second says it wasn’t, all it proves is that Democrats are dumbasses whose knowledge of history goes back about three months. Which theory is it?

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:15:50 +0000

The WSJ has a better explanation. tgirsch´s last blog post..The Bush Legacy

By: tgirsch

tgirsch — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:08:24 +0000

Not that you're terribly interested, but Nate Silver cries foul. And, as a follow up, Ziegler demonstrates that he's a complete tool. tgirsch´s last blog post..The Bush Legacy

By: Kristopher

Kristopher — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:12:53 +0000

Universal suffrage was a bad idea.

Property owners only. If you don’t have a stake, screw your opinions.

At the very least, welfare recipients ( both the poor, and salarymen who get fed subsidies ) should not get a vote, as they are wards of the state.

Odds of this happening? Probably less than zero.

By: gattsuru

gattsuru — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:51:28 +0000

I expect you need to know what the results would be for Republicans, too, before you could make any reasonable assessments. It’s quite possible, if not as likely, that the average Republican believes some things that are false.

The results are rather frightening, “push poll” or not.