http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/comment-page-1/#comment-468165 Xrlq Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:06:35 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/#comment-468165 Welcome to my sidebar, dumbass. Welcome to my sidebar, dumbass.

]]> http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/comment-page-1/#comment-468094 Bart Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:03:26 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/#comment-468094 More likely simply because you're an Obama fanboy... More likely simply because you’re an Obama fanboy…

]]> http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/comment-page-1/#comment-467892 Xrlq Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:57:01 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/#comment-467892 Because it advances frivolous legal theories, is based on factual assertions without a shred of evidence to support them, and was brought by a nut who thinks 9/11 was an inside job. Other than that, I think the Berg case is pretty damned solid. Because it advances frivolous legal theories, is based on factual assertions without a shred of evidence to support them, and was brought by a nut who thinks 9/11 was an inside job. Other than that, I think the Berg case is pretty damned solid.

]]> http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/comment-page-1/#comment-467842 bob Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:11:56 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2008/12/08/supremes-deny-cert/#comment-467842 why do you consider the berg case stupid? why do you consider the berg case stupid?

]]>