Comments on: Conservatism as an Entitlement http://xrlq.com/2009/03/13/conservatism-as-an-entitlement/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:21:18 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Vereen http://xrlq.com/2009/03/13/conservatism-as-an-entitlement/comment-page-1/#comment-500570 Vereen Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:28:52 +0000 http://xrlq.com/?p=4421#comment-500570 This is right here, in the present, not the future. This is right here, in the present, not the future.

]]> By: Daryl Herbert http://xrlq.com/2009/03/13/conservatism-as-an-entitlement/comment-page-1/#comment-498030 Daryl Herbert Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:27:07 +0000 http://xrlq.com/?p=4421#comment-498030 Kmiec, Andrew Sullivan, and Arlen Specter. The libs have decided its more useful to use them as straw men (e.g., "Even the <i>conservative</i> Andrew Sullivan agrees with me!") than to acknowledge that they've flipped. Libs are very good about burning bridges with any lib who even gets close to having moderate views, so we can't do the reverse to them. Not that I care. It's a stupid form of argument to begin with. Kmiec, Andrew Sullivan, and Arlen Specter. The libs have decided its more useful to use them as straw men (e.g., “Even the conservative Andrew Sullivan agrees with me!”) than to acknowledge that they’ve flipped.

Libs are very good about burning bridges with any lib who even gets close to having moderate views, so we can’t do the reverse to them. Not that I care. It’s a stupid form of argument to begin with.

]]>