Comments on: Let’s Hear It For Loopholes http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/ Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Boyd http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-534617 Boyd Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:32:52 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-534617 Ah, now I see the post. Sorry I missed its update until now. I feel obligated to point out that Deeds has worked hard for the past two years to build a "close the gun show loophole" law in Virginia that could get passed through both houses and signed by the Governor. Fortunately, his efforts haven't yielded his desired results. With "gun rights friends" like Deeds, we don't need any enemies. There's no doubt I'm hoping he loses to McDonnell in November. Ah, now I see the post. Sorry I missed its update until now.

I feel obligated to point out that Deeds has worked hard for the past two years to build a “close the gun show loophole” law in Virginia that could get passed through both houses and signed by the Governor.

Fortunately, his efforts haven’t yielded his desired results. With “gun rights friends” like Deeds, we don’t need any enemies. There’s no doubt I’m hoping he loses to McDonnell in November.

]]> By: Xrlq http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-533791 Xrlq Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:39:20 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-533791 The original post had a nested anchor due to "helpful" editing from my email client. Oh well. I shoulda just left the fractured post up the way it was, let y'all flame me in this thread, and re-posted the intended entry somewhere else. The original post had a nested anchor due to “helpful” editing from my email client. Oh well. I shoulda just left the fractured post up the way it was, let y’all flame me in this thread, and re-posted the intended entry somewhere else.

]]> By: Anwyn http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-533756 Anwyn Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:11:07 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-533756 I got it when I saw the whole post, yeah, but my first comment was made when the post consisted of "I'm as happy as the next guy to see 0 Comments" and nothing else. [rq=1051,0,blog][/rq]<a href="http://www.anwyn.com/2009/05/28/yes-all-right-occasionally-this-is-how-i-spend-some-of-my-time/" rel="nofollow">Yes, All Right, Occasionally, This Is How I Spend Some of My Time</a> I got it when I saw the whole post, yeah, but my first comment was made when the post consisted of “I’m as happy as the next guy to see 0 Comments” and nothing else.
[rq=1051,0,blog][/rq]Yes, All Right, Occasionally, This Is How I Spend Some of My Time

]]> By: B Woodman http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-533607 B Woodman Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:55:38 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-533607 I think what DAI was getting after was the two mealy-mouthed losing weasels were trying to scuttle Deeds' election by doing the same thing that Brady does, by using emotionally loaded buzzwords in a phony and misleading manner. Then showing what the law REALLY says. Hope I was able to express that clear as mud. I think what DAI was getting after was the two mealy-mouthed losing weasels were trying to scuttle Deeds’ election by doing the same thing that Brady does, by using emotionally loaded buzzwords in a phony and misleading manner.
Then showing what the law REALLY says.
Hope I was able to express that clear as mud.

]]> By: Anwyn http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-533590 Anwyn Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:07:45 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-533590 People should please ignore my previous comment, as it does not apply to the whole post but to the one-line stub of a post that originally appeared by mistake. People should please ignore my previous comment, as it does not apply to the whole post but to the one-line stub of a post that originally appeared by mistake.

]]> By: Anwyn http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/comment-page-1/#comment-533573 Anwyn Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:37:36 +0000 http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/lets-hear-it-for-loopholes/#comment-533573 Then I guess I'm making you ... unhappy? I don't think I understand the post. Then I guess I’m making you … unhappy? I don’t think I understand the post.

]]>