<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo To My Colleagues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Reverend Enge</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/comment-page-1/#comment-545719</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Reverend Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4531#comment-545719</guid>
		<description>On 25th June 2009, in the High Court in London, Mr Justice Simon awarded summary judgment in favour of Mr Beaumont, and dismissed all allegations against him. He made a costs order in favour of Mr Beaumont. He made an interim award of costs in the sum of £ 50,000. He decided that several of Miss Sheikh&#039;s applications were &quot;totally without merit.&quot; On 5th May 2009, Miss Sheikh was struck off the roll of solicitors by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The SDT found that she had been dishonest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 25th June 2009, in the High Court in London, Mr Justice Simon awarded summary judgment in favour of Mr Beaumont, and dismissed all allegations against him. He made a costs order in favour of Mr Beaumont. He made an interim award of costs in the sum of £ 50,000. He decided that several of Miss Sheikh&#8217;s applications were &#8220;totally without merit.&#8221; On 5th May 2009, Miss Sheikh was struck off the roll of solicitors by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The SDT found that she had been dishonest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/comment-page-1/#comment-534546</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4531#comment-534546</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even sure whether I&#039;m a lawyer or a loyer, let alone barrister vs. solicitor.  I&#039;ve never barristed a case, but I have yet to be busted for solicitation, either.

One thing I do know, though: as wrong as it is for men to pay women for sex, expecting &lt;i&gt;them&lt;/i&gt; to pay &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; is 100 times wronger.  Or maybe 100 times cooler, YMMV.  Whatever it is, it&#039;s not the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even sure whether I&#8217;m a lawyer or a loyer, let alone barrister vs. solicitor.  I&#8217;ve never barristed a case, but I have yet to be busted for solicitation, either.</p>
<p>One thing I do know, though: as wrong as it is for men to pay women for sex, expecting <i>them</i> to pay <i>you</i> is 100 times wronger.  Or maybe 100 times cooler, YMMV.  Whatever it is, it&#8217;s not the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/comment-page-1/#comment-534182</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4531#comment-534182</guid>
		<description>I Googled &quot;anal sheikh&quot;.  (Admit it, if you did, too.)

It turns out she&#039;s a solicitor -- a kind of lawyer who cannot appear in most courts in England but must, instead, &quot;instruct&quot; a barrister.  I am not making this up, the solicitor sends the barrister &quot;briefs&quot;.

I stopped Googling at that point because my imagination will likely be more entertaining than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Googled &#8220;anal sheikh&#8221;.  (Admit it, if you did, too.)</p>
<p>It turns out she&#8217;s a solicitor &#8212; a kind of lawyer who cannot appear in most courts in England but must, instead, &#8220;instruct&#8221; a barrister.  I am not making this up, the solicitor sends the barrister &#8220;briefs&#8221;.</p>
<p>I stopped Googling at that point because my imagination will likely be more entertaining than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigivald</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/comment-page-1/#comment-533610</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigivald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4531#comment-533610</guid>
		<description>Even if business is discussed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if business is discussed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/06/10/memo-to-my-colleagues/comment-page-1/#comment-533249</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=4531#comment-533249</guid>
		<description>Even in Nevada?

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Phelps&#180;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://phelps.donotremove.net/2009/06/giant-satues/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Giant Statues&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in Nevada?</p>
<p><abbr><em>Phelps&#180;s last blog post..<a href="http://phelps.donotremove.net/2009/06/giant-satues/" rel="nofollow">Giant Statues</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

