<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/</link>
	<description>Politische Kommentare mit Snarkenremarken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-560197</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5053#comment-560197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s more like a month of residency, and even then the divorce can be voided if you were not a bona fide resident.  Nevada could abolish this requirement but then other states wouldn&#039;t have to recognize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s more like a month of residency, and even then the divorce can be voided if you were not a bona fide resident.  Nevada could abolish this requirement but then other states wouldn&#8217;t have to recognize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-560196</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5053#comment-560196</guid>
		<description>I thought it used to be (before California &quot;deregulated&quot; divorce) that people who wanted to get divorced for a no-fault reason would move to Nevada for something like 7 days and then they would qualify for divorce. 

I have no doubt that if California &quot;re-regulated&quot; divorce Nevada would step in that &quot;business&quot; opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it used to be (before California &#8220;deregulated&#8221; divorce) that people who wanted to get divorced for a no-fault reason would move to Nevada for something like 7 days and then they would qualify for divorce. </p>
<p>I have no doubt that if California &#8220;re-regulated&#8221; divorce Nevada would step in that &#8220;business&#8221; opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-560175</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5053#comment-560175</guid>
		<description>Um, it wouldn&#039;t be quite that simple.  Unless, of course, by &quot;go to Nevada&quot; you meant actually move there with the intent of remaining indefinitely.  Generally speaking, you can&#039;t get a divorce in a state where neither party to the marriage resides.  For some reason I&#039;ll never understand, the same rule does not apply to getting married in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, it wouldn&#8217;t be quite that simple.  Unless, of course, by &#8220;go to Nevada&#8221; you meant actually move there with the intent of remaining indefinitely.  Generally speaking, you can&#8217;t get a divorce in a state where neither party to the marriage resides.  For some reason I&#8217;ll never understand, the same rule does not apply to getting married in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel B.</title>
		<link>http://xrlq.com/2009/10/24/saving-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-560174</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xrlq.com/?p=5053#comment-560174</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why it would be so bad if it passes...If you want a divorce go to Nevada, clears up like oh 50% of our court calendar, and heck if you do get married, stay married, I&#039;m for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why it would be so bad if it passes&#8230;If you want a divorce go to Nevada, clears up like oh 50% of our court calendar, and heck if you do get married, stay married, I&#8217;m for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

