Excusing Fraud
Old excuse: “Fake but accurate.”
New excuse: “Not faked, but not pretty.”
Old excuse: “Fake but accurate.”
New excuse: “Not faked, but not pretty.”
Speaking of missed deadlines, almost a month has gone since I forgot my last blogiversary. That’s normal, but this time, Alice H. didn’t even remember to razz me about it. Poor schmuckette.
Doubts, (which are not to be confused with reasonable ones) notwithstanding, is justice delayed finally about to mean something other than justice denied?
One can only hope.
Patterico was banned from Charles Johnson’s shitty little blog for … well … disagreeing with shitty little Charles. Apparently, he’s in good company.
The 21st Century and the Third Millennium are only nine years old, but the new decade began today. Discuss.
Chicago Magazine Senior Editor Jennifer Tanaka openly admits to having been a “a rank amateur trying desperately to come to grips with constitutional law” while putting together this factually-challenged write-up on the McDonald plaintiffs. What I want to know is, for all the cases of journalists in over their heads on legal issues, why on earth would a publication leave it up to someone who admits to being in over their heads?
Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for giving Patterico another year’s worth of mockworthy material. That craptastic year 2009 won’t be fully over until you RTWT.
Powered by WordPress. Stock photography by Matthew J. Stinson. Design by OFJ.